From: 胡嘉瑜 <hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com>
To: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13] gro: fix reordering of packets in GRO layer
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 22:28:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_5179002D180D87F2372968176C1FEEF04307@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240108160453.723207-1-kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
在 2024/1/9 上午12:04, Kumara Parameshwaran 写道:
> In the current implementation when a packet is received with
> special TCP flag(s) set, only that packet is delivered out of order.
> There could be already coalesced packets in the GRO table
> belonging to the same flow but not delivered.
> This fix makes sure that the entire segment is delivered with the
> special flag(s) set which is how the Linux GRO is also implemented
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
> ---
> If the received packet is not a pure ACK packet, we check if
> there are any previous packets in the flow, if present we indulge
> the received packet also in the coalescing logic and update the flags
> of the last recived packet to the entire segment which would avoid
> re-ordering.
>
> Lets say a case where P1(PSH), P2(ACK), P3(ACK) are received in burst mode,
> P1 contains PSH flag and since it does not contain any prior packets in the flow
> we copy it to unprocess_packets and P2(ACK) and P3(ACK) are merged together.
> In the existing case the P2,P3 would be delivered as single segment first and the
> unprocess_packets will be copied later which will cause reordering. With the patch
> copy the unprocess packets first and then the packets from the GRO table.
>
> Testing done
> The csum test-pmd was modified to support the following
> GET request of 10MB from client to server via test-pmd (static arp entries added in client
> and server). Enable GRO and TSO in test-pmd where the packets recived from the client mac
> would be sent to server mac and vice versa.
> In above testing, without the patch the client observerd re-ordering of 25 packets
> and with the patch there were no packet re-ordering observerd.
>
> v2:
> Fix warnings in commit and comment.
> Do not consider packet as candidate to merge if it contains SYN/RST flag.
>
> v3:
> Fix warnings.
>
> v4:
> Rebase with master.
>
> v5:
> Adding co-author email
> v6:
> Address review comments from the maintainer to restructure the code
> and handle only special flags PSH,FIN
>
> v7:
> Fix warnings and errors
>
> v8:
> Fix warnings and errors
>
> v9:
> Fix commit message
>
> v10:
> Update tcp header flags and address review comments
>
> v11:
> Fix warnings
>
> v12:
> Fix nit review comments
>
> v13:
> Fix warnings
>
> lib/gro/gro_tcp.h | 9 +++++++++
> lib/gro/gro_tcp4.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> lib/gro/gro_tcp_internal.h | 2 +-
> lib/gro/gro_vxlan_tcp4.c | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Jiayu Hu <hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com>
Thanks,
Jiayu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-16 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-13 10:18 [PATCH] gro : fix reordering of packets in GRO library Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-13 10:20 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-10-28 8:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-28 8:27 ` [PATCH v3] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-28 9:51 ` [PATCH v4] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-11-01 7:05 ` [PATCH v5] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2023-06-19 13:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-20 7:35 ` Hu, Jiayu
2023-06-21 8:47 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2023-06-30 11:32 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2023-12-08 17:54 ` [PATCH v6] gro: fix reordering of packets in GRO layer Kumara Parameshwaran
2023-12-08 18:05 ` [PATCH v7] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2023-12-08 18:12 ` [PATCH v8] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2023-12-08 18:17 ` [PATCH v9] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-04 15:49 ` 胡嘉瑜
2024-01-07 11:21 ` [PATCH v10] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-07 11:29 ` [PATCH v11] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-07 17:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-01-08 16:11 ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2024-01-08 15:50 ` [PATCH v12] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-08 16:04 ` [PATCH v13] " Kumara Parameshwaran
2024-01-16 14:28 ` 胡嘉瑜 [this message]
2024-02-12 14:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tencent_5179002D180D87F2372968176C1FEEF04307@qq.com \
--to=hujiayu.hu@foxmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).