From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003D145D18; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC284066A; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:23:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from out203-205-221-191.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-191.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.191]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id AB86C402A7 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 03:23:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512; t=1731723784; bh=CB22Ow9qMOJPQBvb65Z+uNDPDcmOZU5kch5+sem75xc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=TNaLaqAio0xCaR8hU/h1RsO1v7Bmj6Sjie40tWqhCjCHLs0RtqQmekcx3LPmx7TKo crffjThqgVnYXqtd3NcYoY1AxOAp6LZcVTSRbChVfsdNgWdruVJiBQd2sqYjynRgXG lJbFKM5k/VYNIy153SCCQdtV/J1nbnVZdJ6Ol3aw= Received: from LAPTOP-PMPPB61H ([175.167.145.196]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza15-1.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 42F8D02F; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:16:47 +0800 X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1731723407td0vco5l8 Message-ID: X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MllZffuBkEb5d65AwVodZk+hVfrBs1E4oV1t5APtel2rt8Yfxoi9oBv7NnlIjS YlxWCyadWWH6OV5Xt6nx0mecJVdpf6SPTGhCt13k/Z6yydmy6Y4gCPj33A5ZgHifzSxa3N+dLWtt Uqsy29/b5v3QmpH5MXVYv3CHexNT3r/iXrI3fv1YlMN1M5MKp97bfZRd33GUPQ3Xp39sUUUzwiBd ckJJxEXCAcFBHo/A90YBDHJlc1JvWazp2kRDQqcsC7RA6DO1VZpEhbP19PL+JCDsmaiGOeSLI/mW Q//03eXAqK4TJsD8MT5CnKqQaNO/Phx5RxnxKKnogJh3KmNz0FVGdYgqx0whj8dSViYRw3VHx7dZ 0WJP/SmolXgZAB/fQ76csPfaaFW6mFdWFjD5MoGIN1mfixg19O+dzWVBCwchy/w1l0pvMcndpSLF lG9DsySGLHhx3UGjbWdHPVUqGSGhFO8F5cfFdIrf+vnZVyor5k5W7NPixgnxERVhkXKID2Xjm3Dc 02qZyu/u3AmvG+EUxBXKK7k8HP13OEkVAT8pXD0lSaUUq6Jqukza6BM2GOGMG6QpQZ4G/s7oKlJS wH0XWBxgi30gcYvlkXD/tucU/qsJvPHBvvaT7HRIPy+ASajwteP1Jsq08+ioZ4Zwmth6kyux36cF WxCnJvyqbZposXkHmr1FWPUIH2Yl9M6oIoCBQxI09H72/QRlIy4mLaQRjzJYa7RGEdpRI27JFy59 sQZjlJsc0lM+Y7LSzW6sjz4e1V8+1NiDTdL5syx3d1mU0fEkhKtTLqg8QJmi9OmAxiwj9c3Fmf9Q 4B4R+jJ1iLfE8nlvh/7yaBSfPZWlblSp64Va3Fxo6m8Fy/rWRDMvyJ+qaweKe8ifWTxgTiL1Tp/n N2T5+GlUaBRvoP3980WEpONHTKC06T9Lek+POTjnskyytCJ8rGcajXbhFP38KzaywZnmUw5mLG+Z wofdQrJquu4025OlP56sSDvKA92rc2LN+VCFuVaw4= X-QQ-XMRINFO: NS+P29fieYNw95Bth2bWPxk= Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:16:47 +0800 From: Zhou congjie To: Stephen Hemminger cc: dev , "anatoly.burakov" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal/linux: fix fbarray name with multiple secondaryprocesses In-Reply-To: <20241115120920.6ae82b8e@hermes.local> X-OQ-MSGID: <57c94680-2fc0-20f3-1594-568023837b7c@qq.com> References: <20241115120920.6ae82b8e@hermes.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 15 Nov 2024, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Need to include to get the prototype rte_get_tsc_cycles() When I compile locally (on x86), it compiles successfully whether or not is included. However, cloud testing indicates that compilation fails on other architectures when is not included. Is the cause of the compilation failure? If so, I'm curious why this is the case.