From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC506A034F;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:44:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90E7410F3;
	Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:44:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out203-205-251-53.mail.qq.com (out203-205-251-53.mail.qq.com
 [203.205.251.53])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0AC410EA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:44:39 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com;
 s=s201512; t=1644234277;
 bh=XVWpKlAD33XFyKaPN7/OJfiU4PfkoqQvaKXccdLFJ1I=;
 h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=iUCKN58loT+98pVwl3Nj/HPClSjuYfqPhbEjhA7oOF2J+OEE2YM8KqU1aYgAcFHrG
 LNr68Y3and9KP95WnMufdJ+AlQDXoeiFRaz6zgBHtr3YicPu3SBS0h36hlP1fhouIp
 Bey+kbxfH5eXmFmDCdFZSP2KgkUmAFC7rqHqUvDw=
Received: from liwg-ubuntu.lan ([111.193.130.237])
 by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza5.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP
 id B1D0169D; Mon, 07 Feb 2022 19:44:29 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1644234269tm764e492
Message-ID: <tencent_B21E8153B988159D816FB6917D11F3185A07@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: M1xqn9pGP6LNPjui4LppxArw/DcA35IqAkixRBoM7q3YtvH4hMo941Zde+6iNG
 ff2fkUfSUO2PMZNoIhbYBajMFbCPiu/UiHc8mHGLAk9d6/UpNDir6hUEQDNB6qsurtF0HleAqrDp
 fjAJG4aMuMWtcRPdrsGFdpxfUyjVu5aUkRzPohqtdX9rCXxMa94Pnchw6ipOXyoaJyvZSHvNu77R
 SlpC2IikKXPyynotheoA1Gl8btn5xN0XCgCrskpo6iaDAQ4hfrDEzhV7KMpzXpyVL72OuLmwn7EY
 B1BEZLBnvdBQy2jk88RYyP5oLdRk8Evhz+0IUF4bn5EPO0b4CEvIqcX2Co8S++zK1pcz/3YlxyUG
 gOXKqXi1hBjMPzr3xdphbQXNNg/ZVmr8ius4sqx/6470L6HRC619Sq+YIoZrIN8uPldDYt7i5NEZ
 VwSk45NGRA7wv3lKITRzhLcuotCeSS69mbKLt2CNRtw2egQL4+O1uwrv0Rtk4XcH7B2POB1PIErm
 QTAJ7LNrnYun+OqnNIrivt0QDVffoJzIfUIrw8A8CCBXsxVX0F+Fi95dEVfF+9mUd7XEdmVGT3su
 3Q9HKeL2oynJ2gVFeLdzZ41hPZJDWEHw20q6c3Vf9pIkMd4roPTwIdexbtkrzMhgLmucotx1jf6U
 0QUveFkKRqnxpqs5iX3+TNxT+BnqnhgyCbtMeVZWTjfvalu7CbvCXiTdDUNK2lgWRBFRDmep8ioT
 mBwwjAu5V/sIyDNXY5DYbLqBZ1uf7Y+Fppq4ucanE5FMpDmb3YksbRpUpaE/jAkiMyeh+uFe2NhV
 gW60cMaC+faNE5P1mXfe2EJrtCkfHjYOHsbR6h0q16/naKOL3V5mgSO/mUc3OONAA=
From: Weiguo Li <liwg06@foxmail.com>
To: bruce.richardson@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] fix the curly braces mismatch problem
Date: Mon,  7 Feb 2022 19:44:29 +0800
X-OQ-MSGID: <20220207114429.3269892-1-liwg06@foxmail.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1
In-Reply-To: <tencent_F6238474ECBE8F462E456862FE79944E5109@qq.com>
References: <tencent_F6238474ECBE8F462E456862FE79944E5109@qq.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 09:29:58 +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Any headers that have filenames not starting with "rte_" are internal
> headers, and so should have the guards removed. Therefore, I think that
> most patches in this set should just be removing guards. From my tests with
> building our public headers in C++ files, resulting in series[1], I only
> found one public header with an incorrect guard.
> 
> /Bruce
> 
> [1]http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=21466
> 

Hi Bruce,

Thanks for your tip!

BTW it's strange that some file include these headers by angle-brackets.

I'll update this patch set later.

Thanks,
-Weiguo