From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A3045D08;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2024 03:00:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD9F42EF2;
	Fri, 15 Nov 2024 03:00:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out162-62-57-252.mail.qq.com (out162-62-57-252.mail.qq.com
 [162.62.57.252])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with UTF8SMTP id 462E842E52
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 03:00:31 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s201512;
 t=1731636024; bh=1/p+NojzGDSzfsJI9yQJJR9B2++OdOo2Y4qr2770LYI=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References;
 b=nFMbd20t6+hpYZqUvFtxMD3AUFRg/osUFmqnWOm8luHk86Std2UI36GujngApwieT
 MXH+THBPgFBm+mYcZFMHRLqK+UXYzd+DgMtlqXN7XPDHJ9ya5GUqZ5DcEjcTsc/UIO
 2xQVw3j3pKkhGaG2mZXPilCb4f+CsnEppBTL2zUI=
Received: from LAPTOP-PMPPB61H ([175.167.145.196])
 by newxmesmtplogicsvrszc16-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP
 id 11052D5; Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:00:17 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1731636017tp45dld78
Message-ID: <tencent_C1C9450EE4A1C6E7D258A7E7D4E871CD100A@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MqG4KXyEKpQy92Q4aGh39t78+WKyEKbXkJgzSb0lalW3IgJQqM9gZR22n2EQQu
 FY6T4duPBqjmgnv4ZIj3dPNxZ8VOMA+YNCaW5ph/p2azZ7zaebEDQIMlCjAyL3E/7RR8AcGI2gzF
 5xJ/0aB4JGacNcg00guAnsdiysFqJXJrjOWn/5Th6nawOgT/2AN4tIQqWHgSks6gq3SxGdBmX332
 sOl+emJdGrob5GCEvIPAa+CQt8f1Zyp2K7NdILzmkZfixw2tkirZkDCR4HVSs8CsG4deqngiC8g4
 yW7hLDms8q1VRril1D8UG+0e5m/GIYMqpL45/RRHcgwlk8QLO6SQzRY7BRgYAwpZfogGvjSICCYv
 oyNAtfBcTla9T7jfTTaT+8EFDBthPwxgxcS0G8colVjE18VkvIZ/fJRUOXNifkPPW3ZqafuRX+B8
 zF6SMKGyKqqhiFrCjClYWpUUk77qjo1xsSEm36iT7k4JVd3lzCo7PspAV7+ljBFY7kI5iUSergTY
 V+WtP54Qr8SvMGAQKxfIJuGwyrHVpaFvsedknwYdc0Vrsqfm4ziwY3fOAnoSTy7hAGRvQoNar2jQ
 lw5lw4Sd0i1F9KMHgWhEoX53M384pq7Qm2lbYAuIBbCS31eNrN1mJVlM/9s6FNjQvNaNni4DE7qr
 4EghQfrjk41XV9md/mUYOGt6csldq2TyNnyuXWexa7WpHru5jXjpJDjpr06Xsu+a5wip5sGT1OYi
 73nBQ0iY5O33wV1FTs9/8uQOXunWJJOPihXCQw2bX4J/wGETcj7ONt67yj/IhDvsXzxznHwFhNPV
 9ccqRg1GKJVzEKRJWvTa99JqOwT8/a141CB6YOAZcCm9a4C0ao5OsdXZl0Ahod9DI50KXqz7BpKw
 Ehrhw21Vf66q+QhJzue3wKGuNvw/USUHoWCl0CJ97XBlz1iR8E7r+F8VssnICtTT2Giane6jScFH
 StDBCuxh3dqIMuYD7GD4QL1RP8L8sXDs718kZPPA9VAro0G3S1I2GSKs31yx6a
X-QQ-XMRINFO: NS+P29fieYNw95Bth2bWPxk=
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:00:17 +0800
From: Zhou congjie <zcjie0802@qq.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, "anatoly.burakov" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/linux: redefine the name for rte_fbarray_init()
In-Reply-To: <20241114082459.10a991aa@hermes.local>
X-OQ-MSGID: <068be11b-e884-5db9-1cfe-e76c4ec9a516@qq.com>
References: <tencent_B09D0FCCA142E4AE5ABFE584E92DCED8CB0A@qq.com>
 <20241114082459.10a991aa@hermes.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Thu, 14 Nov 2024, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
 
> 
> In general DPDK uses tsc instead of monotonic time, since it is faster and platform
> independent (ie Windows).
> 
> Why not use use a global counter instead?
> 

I have tried tsc, but it only works on x86 and does not function on other 
architectures.

A global counter seems to be a good idea.