From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gozo.iway.ch (gozo.iway.ch [212.25.24.36]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52A71B2FB for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:09:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from gozo.iway.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E62340E11; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:09:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ACF/6597.15164); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:09:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from switchplus-mail.ch (switchplus-mail.ch [212.25.8.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gozo.iway.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:09:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [195.176.20.45] (account pepperjo@japf.ch) by japf.ch (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 6.1.18) with HTTP id 42312712; Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:09:37 +0100 From: "Jonas Pfefferle" To: "Burakov, Anatoly" , "Thomas Monjalon" Cc: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v6.1.18 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:09:37 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <1509465586-7436-1-git-send-email-jpf@zurich.ibm.com> <5559040.Nhk1psZjz2@xps> <45d1aa7c-2ceb-b6df-8e16-83ff1316cba1@intel.com> <2075027.JcYejM7RvO@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vfio: noiommu check error handling X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:09:37 -0000 On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 10:07:51 +0000 "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote: > On 15-Jan-18 12:22 PM, Jonas Pfefferle wrote: >> >>  On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 23:49:30 +0100 >>  Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 13/01/2018 13:15, Burakov, Anatoly: >>>> On 11-Jan-18 11:45 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>>> > 07/11/2017 10:50, Jonas Pfefferle1: >>>> >>> Is there something urgent for 17.11? >>>> >>> Or can it be refined in 18.02? >>>> >> >>>> >> Nothing urgent. We can refine this for 18.02. >>>> >> >>>> >>> Anatoly, any thought? >>>> > > Anatoly, Jonas, how do you want to proceed with this patch? >>>> > >>>> I don't see anything to be refined here, it's a simple bug fix - >>>>code assumes noiommu mode support is always available, when it might >>>>not be the case on older kernels. >>> >>> As a bug fix, the title must start with "fix" and a tag "Fixes:" >>> must be added to help with backport. >>> At the same time, the explanation of the bug must be added in >>> the commit log please. >>> >>> Thanks >> >> It's not really a bug fix since it does not change the semantic of >>the function but just adds nicer error handling. > > Well, as far as i can tell, it *does* change semantics - previously, >if noiommu mode file was not found, we returned -1, now we return 0. > > > -- > Thanks, > Anatoly True. I can change it to a bug fix.