[dts] [PATCH V1 1/2] test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority: modify rule priority

[dts] [PATCH V1 1/2] test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority: modify rule priority

[Jiale Song]

because the priority of the dpdk rule is changed from 0<1<2... to 0>1>2..., 
modify the testplan

Signed-off-by: Jiale Song <songx.jiale@intel.com>
---
 test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst
index 8ae6052..b73f438 100644
--- a/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst
+++ b/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst
@@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ test steps for supported pattern
 ================================
 1. validate rules: two rules have same pattern, input set but different priority and action(priority 0 -> to vf 1, priority 1 -> to vf 2).
 2. create rules and list rules.
-3. send matched packets, check vf 2 receive the packets for hiting the priority 1.
+3. send matched packets, check vf 1 receive the packets for hiting the priority 0.
 4. send mismatched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
-5. destroy rule with priority 1, list rules.
-6. send matched packets, check vf 1 receive the packets for hiting the priority 0.
+5. destroy rule with priority 0, list rules.
+6. send matched packets, check vf 2 receive the packets for hiting the priority 1.
 7. send mismatched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
-8. recreate rules which priority is 1, list rule.
-9. destroy rule with priority 0, list rules.
-10. send matched packets, check vf 2 receive the packets for hiting the priority 1.
+8. recreate rules which priority is 0, list rule.
+9. destroy rule with priority 1, list rules.
+10. send matched packets, check vf 1 receive the packets for hiting the priority 0.
 11. send mismatched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
-12. destroy rule with priority 1, list rules.
+12. destroy rule with priority 0, list rules.
 13. send matched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
 
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

[dts] [PATCH V1 2/2] tests/cvl_dcf_flow_priority: modify the script according to the testplan

[Jiale Song]

Signed-off-by: Jiale Song <songx.jiale@intel.com>
---
 tests/TestSuite_cvl_dcf_flow_priority.py | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_cvl_dcf_flow_priority.py b/tests/TestSuite_cvl_dcf_flow_priority.py
index 07d99d2..d78a1ae 100644
--- a/tests/TestSuite_cvl_dcf_flow_priority.py
+++ b/tests/TestSuite_cvl_dcf_flow_priority.py
@@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ class CVLDCFFlowPriorityTest(TestCase):
         rule1=rte_flow_pattern[0:14] + "priority 0" + rte_flow_pattern[13:length]
         rule2=rte_flow_pattern[0:14] + "priority 1" + rte_flow_pattern[13:length-7]+ "2" + rte_flow_pattern[length-6:length]
         rte_flow=[rule1, rule2]
+        
         #validate 2 rule
         self.validate_switch_filter_rule(rte_flow)
         #create 2 rule
@@ -1327,31 +1328,34 @@ class CVLDCFFlowPriorityTest(TestCase):
         self.check_switch_filter_rule_list(0, rule_list)
         #send matched packets and check
         matched_dic = test_vector["matched"]
-        matched_dic["check_func"]["param"]["expect_port"]=2
         self.send_and_check_packets(matched_dic)
         #send mismatched packets and check
         mismatched_dic = test_vector["mismatched"]
         mismatched_dic["check_func"]["param"]["expect_port"]=[1,2]
         mismatched_dic["expect_results"]["expect_pkts"]=[0,0]
         self.send_and_check_packets(mismatched_dic)
-        #destroy rule with priority 1
-        self.destroy_switch_filter_rule(0, rule_list[1])
-        self.check_switch_filter_rule_list(0, ['0'])
-        #send matched packets and check
-        destroy_dict1 = copy.deepcopy(matched_dic)
-        destroy_dict1["check_func"]["param"]["expect_port"]=1
-        self.send_and_check_packets(destroy_dict1)
-        #recreate rule with priority 1
-        self.create_switch_filter_rule(rte_flow[1])
-        self.check_switch_filter_rule_list(0, rule_list)
+
         #destroy rule with priority 0
         self.destroy_switch_filter_rule(0, rule_list[0])
+        rule_list.remove('0')
         self.check_switch_filter_rule_list(0, ['1'])
         #send matched packets and check
+        destroy_dict1 = copy.deepcopy(matched_dic)
+        destroy_dict1["check_func"]["param"]["expect_port"]=2
+        self.send_and_check_packets(destroy_dict1)
+
+        #recreate rule with priority 0 (rule 2)
+        self.create_switch_filter_rule(rte_flow[0])
+        rule_list.insert(0, '2')
+        #destroy rule with priority 1
+        self.destroy_switch_filter_rule(0, rule_list[1])
+        self.check_switch_filter_rule_list(0, ['2'])
+        #send matched packets and check
         destroy_dict2 = copy.deepcopy(matched_dic)
         self.send_and_check_packets(destroy_dict2)
-        #destroy rule with priority 1 and check
-        self.destroy_switch_filter_rule(0, rule_list[1])
+
+        #destroy rule with priority 0 and check
+        self.destroy_switch_filter_rule(0, rule_list[0])
         self.check_switch_filter_rule_list(0, [])
         destroy_dict3 = copy.deepcopy(matched_dic)
         if isinstance(destroy_dict3["expect_results"]["expect_pkts"], list):
-- 
1.8.3.1

[dts] [PATCH V1 1/2] test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority: modify rule priority

[Jiale Song]

because the priority of the dpdk rule is changed from 0<1<2... to 0>1>2..., 
modify the testplan

Signed-off-by: Jiale Song <songx.jiale@intel.com>
---
 test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst
index 8ae6052..b73f438 100644
--- a/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst
+++ b/test_plans/cvl_dcf_flow_priority_test_plan.rst
@@ -118,16 +118,16 @@ test steps for supported pattern
 ================================
 1. validate rules: two rules have same pattern, input set but different priority and action(priority 0 -> to vf 1, priority 1 -> to vf 2).
 2. create rules and list rules.
-3. send matched packets, check vf 2 receive the packets for hiting the priority 1.
+3. send matched packets, check vf 1 receive the packets for hiting the priority 0.
 4. send mismatched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
-5. destroy rule with priority 1, list rules.
-6. send matched packets, check vf 1 receive the packets for hiting the priority 0.
+5. destroy rule with priority 0, list rules.
+6. send matched packets, check vf 2 receive the packets for hiting the priority 1.
 7. send mismatched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
-8. recreate rules which priority is 1, list rule.
-9. destroy rule with priority 0, list rules.
-10. send matched packets, check vf 2 receive the packets for hiting the priority 1.
+8. recreate rules which priority is 0, list rule.
+9. destroy rule with priority 1, list rules.
+10. send matched packets, check vf 1 receive the packets for hiting the priority 0.
 11. send mismatched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
-12. destroy rule with priority 1, list rules.
+12. destroy rule with priority 0, list rules.
 13. send matched packets, check the packets are not received by vf 1 or 2.
 
 
-- 
1.8.3.1