From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DA4A0C4B; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:43:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0432D40DDD; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:43:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0952E4068E for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:43:22 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10070"; a="278587806" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,309,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="278587806" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2021 22:43:21 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,309,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="421091475" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2021 22:43:21 -0700 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 22:43:20 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:43:18 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.010; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:43:18 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Peng, Yuan" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Peng, Yuan" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V2]test_plans/cvl_dcf_switch_filter: modify the mask value in testplan Thread-Index: AQHXiqHlXEmVYKOclEe4i4ngVRZFlKtsPt2Q Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:43:18 +0000 Message-ID: <1c645a422ce04b60bd86b595f79388e1@intel.com> References: <20210806020119.83529-1-yuan.peng@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210806020119.83529-1-yuan.peng@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V2]test_plans/cvl_dcf_switch_filter: modify the mask value in testplan X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > -----Original Message----- > From: dts On Behalf Of Peng Yuan > Sent: 2021=1B$BG/=1B(B8=1B$B7n=1B(B6=1B$BF|=1B(B 10:01 > To: dts@dpdk.org > Cc: Peng, Yuan > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V2]test_plans/cvl_dcf_switch_filter: modify the mas= k > value in testplan >=20 > the ipv4 pattern, when the action is drop, and the mask is not 255.255.25= 5.255, > the rule created is as a acl rule. only the acl rule table is full, the r= ule is created > as switch rule. > when the mask is 255.255.255.255, the rule is created as switch rule. > so modify all the mask to 255.255.255.255 when the action is drop. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Peng Yuan Test plans and test suites with coupled changes should be put in the same s= eries. So could you please re-submit your patches in the same series: http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dts/patch/20210806020119.83529-1-yuan.pen= g@intel.com/ http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dts/patch/20210809153803.7686-1-zhiminx.h= uang@intel.com/ Furthermore, please Superseded your old version if you getting a newer one.