From: Ling Wei <weix.ling@intel.com>
To: dts@dpdk.org
Cc: Ling Wei <weix.ling@intel.com>
Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/pvp_vhost_user_reconnect: modify iperf test case expected value
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 10:47:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210409024752.253366-1-weix.ling@intel.com> (raw)
Because of repeat iperf test on FVL-40g nic, the result
is unstable, so use 15Gb/s as check value.
Signed-off-by: Ling Wei <weix.ling@intel.com>
---
tests/TestSuite_pvp_vhost_user_reconnect.py | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_pvp_vhost_user_reconnect.py b/tests/TestSuite_pvp_vhost_user_reconnect.py
index bd1f3937..4be19c5a 100644
--- a/tests/TestSuite_pvp_vhost_user_reconnect.py
+++ b/tests/TestSuite_pvp_vhost_user_reconnect.py
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ class TestPVPVhostUserReconnect(TestCase):
if packed is True:
setting_args = "%s,packed=on" % setting_args
for i in range(self.vm_num):
- vm_info = VM(self.dut, 'vm%d' % i, 'vhost_sample')
+ vm_info = VM(self.dut, 'vm%d' % i, 'vhost_sample_copy')
vm_params = {}
vm_params['driver'] = 'vhost-user'
vm_params['opt_path'] = './vhost-net%d' % (i)
@@ -391,6 +391,8 @@ class TestPVPVhostUserReconnect(TestCase):
self.config_vm_intf()
self.start_iperf()
self.before_data = self.iperf_result_verify(vm_cycle, 'before reconnet')
+ # Because of repeat iperf test on FVL-40g nic, the result is unstable, so use 15Gb/s as check value.
+ self.check_data = 15.000
vm_cycle = 1
# reconnet from vhost
@@ -400,7 +402,8 @@ class TestPVPVhostUserReconnect(TestCase):
self.launch_testpmd_as_vhost_user_with_no_pci()
self.start_iperf()
self.reconnect_data = self.iperf_result_verify(vm_cycle, 'reconnet from vhost')
- self.check_reconnect_perf()
+ self.verify(self.reconnect_data >= self.check_data,
+ 'iperf test result lower than {0} after reconnect from vhost'.format(self.check_data))
# reconnet from VM
self.logger.info('now reconnect from vm')
@@ -413,7 +416,8 @@ class TestPVPVhostUserReconnect(TestCase):
self.config_vm_intf()
self.start_iperf()
self.reconnect_data = self.iperf_result_verify(vm_cycle, 'reconnet from vm')
- self.check_reconnect_perf()
+ self.verify(self.reconnect_data > self.check_data,
+ 'iperf test result lower than {0} after reconnect from vm'.format(self.check_data))
self.result_table_print()
def test_perf_packed_ring_reconnet_one_vm(self):
@@ -494,6 +498,8 @@ class TestPVPVhostUserReconnect(TestCase):
self.config_vm_intf()
self.start_iperf()
self.before_data = self.iperf_result_verify(vm_cycle, 'before reconnet')
+ # Because of repeat iperf test on FVL-40g nic, the result is unstable, so use 15Gb/s as check value.
+ self.check_data = 15.000
vm_cycle = 1
# reconnet from vhost
@@ -503,7 +509,8 @@ class TestPVPVhostUserReconnect(TestCase):
self.launch_testpmd_as_vhost_user_with_no_pci()
self.start_iperf()
self.reconnect_data = self.iperf_result_verify(vm_cycle, 'reconnet from vhost')
- self.check_reconnect_perf()
+ self.verify(self.reconnect_data > self.check_data,
+ 'iperf test result lower than {0} after reconnect from vhost'.format(self.check_data))
# reconnet from VM
self.logger.info('now reconnect from vm')
@@ -515,7 +522,8 @@ class TestPVPVhostUserReconnect(TestCase):
self.config_vm_intf()
self.start_iperf()
self.reconnect_data = self.iperf_result_verify(vm_cycle, 'reconnet from vm')
- self.check_reconnect_perf()
+ self.verify(self.reconnect_data > self.check_data,
+ 'iperf test result lower than {0} after recconnect from vm'.format(self.check_data))
self.result_table_print()
def tear_down(self):
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-09 2:47 Ling Wei [this message]
2021-04-09 2:51 ` Ling, WeiX
2021-04-12 2:48 ` Wang, Yinan
2021-04-12 5:34 ` Tu, Lijuan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-04-09 2:44 Ling Wei
2021-04-07 9:02 Ling Wei
2021-04-07 9:07 ` Ling, WeiX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210409024752.253366-1-weix.ling@intel.com \
--to=weix.ling@intel.com \
--cc=dts@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).