Tested-by: Zhang, YanX A -----Original Message----- From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jianwei Mei Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 7:54 PM To: dts@dpdk.org Cc: Mei, JianweiX Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/runtime_vf_queue_number: add case add case,bug fixed on dpdk19.08 for set invalid VF queue number with testpmd function command. Signed-off-by: Jianwei Mei --- tests/TestSuite_runtime_vf_queue_number.py | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_runtime_vf_queue_number.py b/tests/TestSuite_runtime_vf_queue_number.py index 227d815..940e36a 100644 --- a/tests/TestSuite_runtime_vf_queue_number.py +++ b/tests/TestSuite_runtime_vf_queue_number.py @@ -341,8 +341,21 @@ class TestRuntimeVfQn(TestCase): Test case 6: set invalid VF queue number with testpmd function command :return: """ - # There is a bug of this test case, so the function hasn't been implemented. - pass + expect_str = ["Warning: Either rx or tx queues should be non zero", + "Fail: input rxq (17) can't be greater than max_rx_queues (16) of port 0", + "Fail: input txq (17) can't be greater than max_tx_queues (16) of port 0"] + host_eal_param = '-w %s --file-prefix=test1 --socket-mem 1024,1024' % self.pf_pci + self.host_testpmd.start_testpmd(self.pmdout.default_cores, param='', eal_param=host_eal_param) + gest_eal_param = '-w %s --file-prefix=test2' % self.vm_dut_0.ports_info[0]['pci'] + self.vm0_testpmd = PmdOutput(self.vm_dut_0) + self.vm0_testpmd.start_testpmd(self.pmdout.default_cores, eal_param=gest_eal_param, param='') + for invalid_qn in [0, 17]: + self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('port stop all') + rxq_output = self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('port config all rxq %d' % invalid_qn) + txq_output = self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('port config all txq %d' % invalid_qn) + self.verify(rxq_output or txq_output in expect_str, "The output is not expect.") + self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('port start all') + self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('quit', '# ') def test_reserve_vf_qn(self): """ -- 1.8.3.1