test suite reviews and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, ChangqingX" <changqingx.wu@intel.com>
To: "Mo, YufengX" <yufengx.mo@intel.com>, "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1]test_plans/pmd_stacked_bonded: update test plan
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:10:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7F81DD3887C58F49A6B2EFEC3C28E22E0B746E79@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1566797465-122445-2-git-send-email-yufengx.mo@intel.com>

Tested-by: Wu, ChangqingX <changqingx.wu@intel.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Mo, YufengX 
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 1:31 PM
To: Wu, ChangqingX <changqingx.wu@intel.com>; dts@dpdk.org
Cc: Mo, YufengX <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
Subject: [dts][PATCH V1]test_plans/pmd_stacked_bonded: update test plan


port start all action implies the race condition. The right way is to start top level bond port only, and let it propagate the start action to slave bond ports and its the real nics.

Signed-off-by: yufengmx <yufengx.mo@intel.com>
---
 test_plans/pmd_stacked_bonded_test_plan.rst | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test_plans/pmd_stacked_bonded_test_plan.rst b/test_plans/pmd_stacked_bonded_test_plan.rst
index be0da9a..a864f1f 100644
--- a/test_plans/pmd_stacked_bonded_test_plan.rst
+++ b/test_plans/pmd_stacked_bonded_test_plan.rst
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ based on RRC. The customer already uses Mellanox 100G NICs. Mellanox 100G NICs  support a proper x16 PCIe interface so the host sees a single netdev and that  netdev corresponds directly to the 100G Ethernet port. They indicated that in  their current system they bond multiple 100G NICs together, using DPDK bonding -API in their application. They are interested in looking at an alternatve source
+API in their application. They are interested in looking at an 
+alternative source
 for the 100G NIC and are in conversation with Silicom who are shipping a 100G  RRC based NIC (something like Boulder Rapids). The issue they have with RRC NIC  is that the NIC presents as two PCIe interfaces (netdevs) instead of one. If the @@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ steps
     testpmd> show bonding config 3
     testpmd> show bonding config 4
 
-#. start all ports to check ports start action::
+#. start top level bond port to check ports start action::
 
-    testpmd> port start all
+    testpmd> port start 4
     testpmd> start
 
 #. close testpmd::
@@ -194,9 +194,9 @@ steps
     testpmd> add bonding slave 3 4
     testpmd> show bonding config 4
 
-#. start all bonded device ports::
+#. start top level bond port::
 
-    testpmd> port start all
+    testpmd> port start 4
     testpmd> start
 
 #. send 100 tcp packets to portA 0 and portA 1::
@@ -260,9 +260,9 @@ steps
     testpmd> add bonding slave 5 6
     testpmd> show bonding config 6
 
-#. start all ports::
+#. start top level bond port::
 
-    testpmd> port start all
+    testpmd> port start 6
     testpmd> start
 
 #. send 100 packets to portA 0/portA 0a/portA 1/portA 1a separately::
@@ -317,9 +317,9 @@ steps
     testpmd> add bonding slave 3 4
     testpmd> show bonding config 4
 
-#. start all ports::
+#. start top level bond port::
 
-    testpmd> port start all
+    testpmd> port start 4
     testpmd> start
 
 #. send 100 packets to portA 0 and portA 1::
@@ -385,9 +385,9 @@ steps
     testpmd> add bonding slave 5 6
     testpmd> show bonding config 6
 
-#. start all ports::
+#. start top level bond port::
 
-    testpmd> port start all
+    testpmd> port start 6
     testpmd> start
 
 #. send 100 packets to portA 0/portA 0a/portA 1/portA 1a separately::
--
1.9.3


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-26  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-26  5:31 yufengmx
2019-08-26  5:31 ` yufengmx
2019-08-26  7:10   ` Wu, ChangqingX [this message]
2019-09-04  5:04   ` Tu, Lijuan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7F81DD3887C58F49A6B2EFEC3C28E22E0B746E79@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=changqingx.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=dts@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yufengx.mo@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).