From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF92DA0C4B; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7762F4117E; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:55:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D20B4068E for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 07:55:30 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10070"; a="214827120" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,309,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="214827120" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Aug 2021 22:55:30 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,309,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="468924583" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2021 22:55:30 -0700 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 22:55:29 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.10; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:55:27 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.010; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:55:27 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Huang, ZhiminX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Huang, ZhiminX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V2] tests/cvl_advanced_rss_pppoe:remove destroy rule test steps Thread-Index: AQHXid++preAIVoXA0iB4l07szXha6tsQ45Q Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:55:27 +0000 Message-ID: <7fa31be761964df28eacce667cdd7037@intel.com> References: <20210805182314.18713-1-zhiminx.huang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210805182314.18713-1-zhiminx.huang@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V2] tests/cvl_advanced_rss_pppoe:remove destroy rule test steps X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > -----Original Message----- > From: dts On Behalf Of Zhimin Huang > Sent: 2021=1B$BG/=1B(B8=1B$B7n=1B(B6=1B$BF|=1B(B 2:23 > To: dts@dpdk.org > Cc: Huang, ZhiminX > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V2] tests/cvl_advanced_rss_pppoe:remove destroy rul= e > test steps >=20 > *.dpdk cannot guarantee the operation after destroy the rule, so remove > destroy rule test steps. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Zhimin Huang I think because of the reason, multiple cases/suites/plans should be change= d accordingly. It is strongly requested to include them in the same patch series. thanks