From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C705BA0552; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:16:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0AC40041; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:16:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1344003F for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 09:16:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1668845798; x=1700381798; h=message-id:date:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version: subject:from:to:reply-to:cc:in-reply-to; bh=562/6poBow++ODS3d0L8L9R8GZgVvmldT22lWHqbSB8=; b=OneCRxACIYdGcHP6j5NnZGCEl3oK0uNQXm8fXAtaSUovjuaCfsY/0Gc6 aaa64OfXIzlTjL4lUC2/UiWqgADpCY3qZIHTMrtkvhNxogJUwaiH9okfO KpO+et5JgnWfDzWc+FvRmtJ23yvRrfQExMMuW0aRcCD9s0UUqjHS92S8D kp53i162BqwnTU/XWxoOWqTQ677A5hE/w4sBHQf7lM3F47coJXtQbHjJM lLUygax+yWlozRL6Nm6D3XVC2wyK6jEP597yyTU7uaDy/8Us4MELOD/a+ 5xXr3gXAVjB72rVrLadktshRJ/wd4wDxq7EzlKmUOC3eQO2Jpb1qvdaz+ A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10535"; a="310934060" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,175,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="310934060" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2022 00:16:36 -0800 Message-Id: <8251fc$k28cd1@orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com> Date: 19 Nov 2022 00:16:35 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10535"; a="673460644" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,175,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="673460644" Received: from dpdk-lijuan-1.sh.intel.com ([10.67.119.225]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2022 00:16:35 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dts] [PATCH V2] tests/ice_ecpri: optimize script to solve case random failed issue From: lijuan.tu@intel.com To: dts@dpdk.org,Song Jiale Cc: Song Jiale In-Reply-To: <20221118133928.8516-1-songx.jiale@intel.com> X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Song Jiale Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 13:39:28 +0000, Song Jiale wrote: > fix 2 issue that cause the case to fail randomly: > 1. when the hash value is different, the queue may be the same. the num= ber of different queues deleted is equal to=20 > the number of different hash values. > 2. because the queue allocated by the packets hitting the fdir rule may= be the same as the queue calculated by the=20 > hash, but the test is to check that the queue conforming to this rule is di= fferent from the queue calculated by the hash=20 > value, which causes the case test to fail. therefore, delete the hash value= calculation check in this case. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Song Jiale Applied, thanks