test suite reviews and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: "Zhao, MeijuanX" <meijuanx.zhao@intel.com>,
	"dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhao, MeijuanX" <meijuanx.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/vf daemon fix vlan issue
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:42:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E62FC5DAD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1520904781-81004-1-git-send-email-meijuanx.zhao@intel.com>

Meijuan,
I think DPDK should keep PF/VF vlan related setting same across the NICs. 
There're lot of special NIC type check in your patch. Please check whether they are must needed.

Thanks,
Marvin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of zhao,meijuan
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 9:33 AM
> To: dts@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhao, MeijuanX <meijuanx.zhao@intel.com>
> Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/vf daemon fix vlan issue
> 
> add enable vlan filter parameter, you can refer to dpdk 8b9bd0,
> vlan default promiscuous setting is different for different
> VF kernel driver
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhao,meijuan <meijuanx.zhao@intel.com>
> ---
>  tests/TestSuite_vf_daemon.py | 11 ++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_vf_daemon.py b/tests/TestSuite_vf_daemon.py
> index b1ad522..08d6abe 100644
> --- a/tests/TestSuite_vf_daemon.py
> +++ b/tests/TestSuite_vf_daemon.py
> @@ -562,13 +562,15 @@ class Testvf_daemon(TestCase):
>          Enable/disable vlan antispoof for a VF from PF
>          """
>          self.check_vf_link_status()
> -
> +        if self.kdriver == "ixgbe":
> +            self.dut_testpmd.execute_cmd('vlan set filter on 0')

Why need to enable vlan filter on PF device for ixgbe? 

>          self.vf0_mac = self.vm0_testpmd.get_port_mac(0)
>          vf0_mac_lower = self.vf0_mac.lower()
>          random_vlan = random.randint(1, MAX_VLAN)
>          match_vlan = random_vlan
>          unmatch_vlan = (random_vlan + 2) % 4096
>          self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('set fwd mac')
> +        self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('vlan set filter on 0')
>          self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('start')
>          #self.dut_testpmd.execute_cmd('rx_vlan add %d port 0 vf 1' %
> match_vlan)
>          self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('rx_vlan add %d 0' % match_vlan)
> @@ -607,6 +609,9 @@ class Testvf_daemon(TestCase):
>          out = self.send_and_macstrip(self.vf0_mac)
>          self.verify(vf0_mac_lower not in out,
>              "Failed to enable vlan antispoof with no vlan!!!")
> +        self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('vlan set filter off 0')
> +        if self.kdriver == "ixgbe":
> +            self.dut_testpmd.execute_cmd('vlan set filter off 0')
> 
> 
>      def test_vlan_strip(self):
> @@ -618,6 +623,8 @@ class Testvf_daemon(TestCase):
> 
>          random_vlan = random.randint(1, MAX_VLAN - 1)
>          rx_vlans = [1, random_vlan, MAX_VLAN]
> +        if self.kdriver == "ixgbe":
> +            self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('vlan set filter on 0')

I think vlan setting should be the same across NICs when using dpdk. Why only ixgbe should enable vlan filter?

>          self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('set fwd mac')
>          self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('set verbose 1')
>          self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('start')
> @@ -632,6 +639,8 @@ class Testvf_daemon(TestCase):
>              time.sleep(3)
>              out = self.send_and_vlanstrip(self.vf0_mac,rx_vlan)
>              self.verify(rx_vlan not in out, "Failed to disable strip
> vlan!!!")
> +        if self.kdriver == "ixgbe":
> +            self.vm0_testpmd.execute_cmd('vlan set filter off 0')
> 
> 
>      def test_vlan_filter(self):
> --
> 1.9.3

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-19  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-13  1:33 zhao,meijuan
2018-03-19  8:42 ` Liu, Yong [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-12 10:01 zhao,meijuan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E62FC5DAD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=dts@dpdk.org \
    --cc=meijuanx.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).