From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047F6A09E9; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 03:11:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC1B1E2F; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 03:11:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE98EA3 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 03:11:36 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: cJpiKmG65ZFPatZaPzCkgxWcnZMJ9JbCdmOmiZevpCVINbLhPU4vT5g4lW0lL4cYLjgJDqneoz tZL0d60pjb9w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9835"; a="161866125" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,420,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="161866125" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Dec 2020 18:11:34 -0800 IronPort-SDR: c10bkTCfiV395Ke+AO1iEDUeLpdRpgD2u10lwFwRy11Dd/pEHWAUMBb5L04valMAI+VtFmCIj2 FH4XfWSBp87A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,420,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="384499275" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2020 18:11:34 -0800 Received: from shsmsx604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:11:33 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX604.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:11:32 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 10:11:32 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Tu, Lijuan" , "Zhao, HaiyangX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Zhao, HaiyangX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1 0/3] replace i40evf with iavf in framework Thread-Index: AQHW0oeb/euIsTCOSk2nbP3spBMDkA== Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 02:11:31 +0000 Message-ID: <868da8a5182f482887bc5715b0d3f2f7@intel.com> References: <20201211070828.24244-1-haiyangx.zhao@intel.com> <0ab02e01f56241b7bce29b98aaca7dc5@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <0ab02e01f56241b7bce29b98aaca7dc5@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1 0/3] replace i40evf with iavf in framework X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > -----Original Message----- > From: dts On Behalf Of Tu, Lijuan > Sent: 2020=1B$BG/=1B(B12=1B$B7n=1B(B11=1B$BF|=1B(B 15:25 > To: Zhao, HaiyangX ; dts@dpdk.org > Cc: Zhao, HaiyangX > Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1 0/3] replace i40evf with iavf in framework >=20 > > Now we need to replace i40evf with iavf for the nics whose kernel > > driver is i40e, and there are about 20 suites need to do this. > > > > Do this replacement in suites is duplicated and will cost lot of time > > when recompiling DPDK, so we do it in framework. > > > > Delete the replacement code in kernelpf_iavf as it has been done in > > framework. > > > > Haiyang Zhao (3): > > framework/dut: add an attribute nic in dut get the instance of > > NetDevice from the port_info, and save it in dut as attribute nic. > > framework/project_dpdk: replace i40evf with iavf > > tests/kernelpf_iavf: delete code of replacing i40evf replace i40evf > > with iavf is completed in framework, so delete the code of replacin= g > > i40evf. >=20 >=20 > Please consider clean up related code as next job, such us test plan, tes= t > suites, thanks Applied