From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6857EA0C4B; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:11:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394FD40E03; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:11:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E18E4068B for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 10:11:14 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10162"; a="232655429" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,219,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="232655429" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Nov 2021 01:11:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.87,219,1631602800"; d="scan'208";a="491591143" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2021 01:11:11 -0800 Received: from shsmsx606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.12; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:11:10 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.12; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:11:08 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.012; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:11:08 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Jiang, YuX" , "Peng, Yuan" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Jiang, YuX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V3 2/2] tests/pmdrss_hash: replace legacy filter with rte_flow Thread-Index: AQHX1G/oUFUJWalJEE2td7Gz3ClXzav66mhg Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:11:08 +0000 Message-ID: <893c8bcf39274d1f882cbef077c14d55@intel.com> References: <1636355396-12864-1-git-send-email-yux.jiang@intel.com> <1636355396-12864-3-git-send-email-yux.jiang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1636355396-12864-3-git-send-email-yux.jiang@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.6.200.16 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V3 2/2] tests/pmdrss_hash: replace legacy filter with rte_flow X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > -----Original Message----- > From: dts On Behalf Of Yu Jiang > Sent: 2021=1B$BG/=1B(B11=1B$B7n=1B(B8=1B$BF|=1B(B 15:10 > To: Peng, Yuan ; dts@dpdk.org > Cc: Jiang, YuX > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V3 2/2] tests/pmdrss_hash: replace legacy filter wi= th > rte_flow >=20 > According to dpdk commit 81db321da("ethdev: remove legacy HASH filter typ= e > support"), remove legacy hash filter to use rte_flow api replace. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Yu Jiang Is there any other case impact by the dpdk commit ? if yes, please fix them= too.