From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E0DA04F5; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE66E07; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0469ADE0 for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:50:27 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: C8PPkYXAUokSCAolIYl+rKSRs3NxtuUWI3VD8QMMDpP8MB1N2RicQPpHrozDFt8ccVJ5uZ6Fb+ v7dwCj/Js6AQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9656"; a="144333191" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,253,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="144333191" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jun 2020 21:50:26 -0700 IronPort-SDR: cbGpHN4wfQpVM9VFnj7kGihtbTTCJ7b2Qiq1giZIESYk2I8dIXUTwlg8f0Iqgv8R8IagSvL8SU nsgDu2bMdMmg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,253,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="277881121" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2020 21:50:26 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.8) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 21:50:26 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 21:50:26 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.85]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 19 Jun 2020 12:50:22 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Zhao, HaiyangX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Zhao, HaiyangX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1] conf/test_case_checklist: skip cases which use DPDK PF to create vf for CVL Thread-Index: AQHWP8iNwq6QyvsKJ0ShACBdR1udrajfaqwg Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 04:50:22 +0000 Message-ID: <8CE3E05A3F976642AAB0F4675D0AD20E0BC5FB3C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1591862750-157926-1-git-send-email-haiyangx.zhao@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1591862750-157926-1-git-send-email-haiyangx.zhao@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] conf/test_case_checklist: skip cases which use DPDK PF to create vf for CVL X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" Applied, thanks -----Original Message----- From: dts On Behalf Of Haiyang Zhao Sent: 2020=1B$BG/=1B(B6=1B$B7n=1B(B11=1B$BF|=1B(B 16:06 To: dts@dpdk.org Cc: Zhao, HaiyangX Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] conf/test_case_checklist: skip cases which use DP= DK PF to create vf for CVL *.CVL do not support DPDK PF + DPDK VF Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhao --- conf/test_case_checklist.json | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) diff --git a/conf/test_case_checklist.json b/conf/test_case_checklist.json = index 73eda68..bc669a5 100644 --- a/conf/test_case_checklist.json +++ b/conf/test_case_checklist.json @@ -3425,5 +3425,69 @@ "Bug ID": "", "Comments": "32 bites not support this case(memoory not enough= )." } + ], + "dpdk_2pf_2vf_1vm_iplink_macfilter": [ + { + "OS": [ + "ALL" + ], + "NIC": [ + "columbiaville_100g", + "columbiaville_25g" + ], + "Target": [ + "ALL" + ], + "Bug ID": "", + "Comments": "CVL not support DPDK PF + DPDK VF" + } + ], + "dpdk_2pf_2vf_1vm": [ + { + "OS": [ + "ALL" + ], + "NIC": [ + "columbiaville_100g", + "columbiaville_25g" + ], + "Target": [ + "ALL" + ], + "Bug ID": "", + "Comments": "CVL not support DPDK PF + DPDK VF" + } + ], + "dpdk_pf_vf_reset": [ + { + "OS": [ + "ALL" + ], + "NIC": [ + "columbiaville_100g", + "columbiaville_25g" + ], + "Target": [ + "ALL" + ], + "Bug ID": "", + "Comments": "CVL not support DPDK PF + DPDK VF" + } + ], + "VEB_switching_inter_vfs_and_pf": [ + { + "OS": [ + "ALL" + ], + "NIC": [ + "columbiaville_100g", + "columbiaville_25g" + ], + "Target": [ + "ALL" + ], + "Bug ID": "", + "Comments": "CVL not support DPDK PF + DPDK VF" + } ] } -- 1.8.3.1