From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E50A0C44; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:16:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F0F1414DC; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:16:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E144069D for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:16:32 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: /QNWhZgxjdbPgOaBp8wv9ZG1ZiZhyIgdyHygpx2I4sINxFcnQ+FDRnevJpGsOAs/hZ+nEh8mtj r1I8mtTlLBAA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9951"; a="194143479" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,214,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="194143479" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Apr 2021 22:16:31 -0700 IronPort-SDR: TNR1rcTP79R2pM581HV3iBEfA5hQI9qAwMo70DkELXz8LhXwOBRm63YMxgJmWbsQV/SpMWTiOR TiQ0Lg4crkyQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,214,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="451280938" Received: from fmsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.85]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2021 22:16:30 -0700 Received: from shsmsx605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) by fmsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 22:16:29 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:16:27 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:16:27 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Pattan, Reshma" , "dts@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH 4/4] tests/TestSuite_vm_pw_mgmt_policy: change core_mask Thread-Index: AQHXK4aj/IcIGUKfWke9/2e8jahXEKqqUlzQ//9/kACABoyPIA== Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 05:16:27 +0000 Message-ID: <9ddedfd65a6c4bfea4ebc6295f30cbe2@intel.com> References: <20210407081807.29110-1-reshma.pattan@intel.com> <20210407081807.29110-4-reshma.pattan@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH 4/4] tests/TestSuite_vm_pw_mgmt_policy: change core_mask X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > -----Original Message----- > From: Pattan, Reshma >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tu, Lijuan > > > > > Cc: Pattan, Reshma > > > - 'core_mask': self.get_cores_mask("1S/3C/1T"), > > > + 'core_mask': '0xffff', > > > > Some server may not have so many cores, prefer to > > get_cores_mask("all") if need many cores. >=20 > AFAIK, get_cores_mask("all") will return all cores except the core0. I ac= tually > need the core0 too. > Is there any API that I can use which returns core 0 too, if not I might = need to > have this explicit core mask. Set bypass_core0=3DFalse, then DTS will utilize core 0.