From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749141B681 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 08:25:35 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 May 2018 23:25:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,404,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="199748325" Received: from fmsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.203]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2018 23:25:33 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx152.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.5) by FMSMSX105.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 15 May 2018 23:25:32 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX152.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 15 May 2018 23:25:26 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.40]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 16 May 2018 14:25:25 +0800 From: "Wang, FeiX Y" To: "Tu, Lijuan" , "dts@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite Thread-Index: AQHT6ybGbpbSRM9XeUy+a82GAHXYCaQx5/WA///+MnA= Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 06:25:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1526271798-22666-1-git-send-email-feix.y.wang@intel.com> <1526480921-158627-1-git-send-email-lijuan.tu@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1526480921-158627-1-git-send-email-lijuan.tu@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 06:25:35 -0000 Yes, bindings VFs to vfio-pci is also ok, but the case just has specified v= fio-pci for the test. -----Original Message----- From: Tu, Lijuan=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:29 PM To: Wang, FeiX Y ; dts@dpdk.org Cc: Tu, Lijuan Subject: Re: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite Should it support vfio? I think binding vfs to vfio-pci should be also supported. -----Original Message----- From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of wang fei Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 07:23 To: dts@dpdk.org Cc: Wang, FeiX Y Subject: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite