From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722711B421 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 08:35:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 May 2018 23:35:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,404,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="228899181" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 May 2018 23:35:22 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx151.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.4) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 15 May 2018 23:35:22 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by FMSMSX151.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 15 May 2018 23:35:21 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.40]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.240]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 16 May 2018 14:35:20 +0800 From: "Wang, FeiX Y" To: "Tu, Lijuan" , "dts@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite Thread-Index: AQHT6ybGbpbSRM9XeUy+a82GAHXYCaQx5/WA///+MnD//3yegIAAhtkg Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 06:35:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1526271798-22666-1-git-send-email-feix.y.wang@intel.com> <1526480921-158627-1-git-send-email-lijuan.tu@intel.com> <8CE3E05A3F976642AAB0F4675D0AD20EE077E1@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <8CE3E05A3F976642AAB0F4675D0AD20EE077E1@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 06:35:24 -0000 That is ok, will put in this clarification for the test plan. Thanks Fei -----Original Message----- From: Tu, Lijuan=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 2:32 PM To: Wang, FeiX Y ; dts@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite Hi fei, Thank you for your clarification Could you add this in the test plan to clarify that it doesn't support norm= al vfio-pci. Since we may misunderstand it and use vfio-pci for VF driver. -----Original Message----- From: Wang, FeiX Y=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 2:25 PM To: Tu, Lijuan ; dts@dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite Yes, bindings VFs to vfio-pci is also ok, but the case just has specified v= fio-pci for the test. -----Original Message----- From: Tu, Lijuan=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:29 PM To: Wang, FeiX Y ; dts@dpdk.org Cc: Tu, Lijuan Subject: Re: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite Should it support vfio? I think binding vfs to vfio-pci should be also supported. -----Original Message----- From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of wang fei Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 07:23 To: dts@dpdk.org Cc: Wang, FeiX Y Subject: [dts] [DTS][Patch V1 0/2] VF_performace_test_suite