test suite reviews and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ma, LihongX" <lihongx.ma@intel.com>
To: "Li, WenjieX A" <wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>, "dts@dpdk.org" <dts@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Li, WenjieX A" <wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/interrupt_pmd: reduce the execution time
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 08:53:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BE1E572D0441E34284F1F8B7AC28F1970BB295D2@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1574788723-61123-1-git-send-email-wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>

Hi, Wenjie
It is better use the Packet function instead of execute scapy in suite.
Like:
Pkt = Packet()
Str='Ether()/IP(dst="198.0.0.1")/UDP()/Raw(\'X\'*18)'
Pkt.append_pkt(str)
Pkt. send_pkt(crb=self.tester, tx_port=txItf)
By the way, the value " txport", " mac", " txItf"  can move to outer loopback from inner loopback, because the value does not change after outer loopback.

-----Original Message-----
From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wenjie Li
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 1:19 AM
To: dts@dpdk.org
Cc: Li, WenjieX A <wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>
Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/interrupt_pmd: reduce the execution time

It is unnecessary to start/close scapy when sending every packet.
The execution time could be reduced to 1 minute from 9.

Signed-off-by: Wenjie Li <wenjiex.a.li@intel.com>
---
 tests/TestSuite_interrupt_pmd.py | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/TestSuite_interrupt_pmd.py b/tests/TestSuite_interrupt_pmd.py
index a0467bd..4e99cf4 100644
--- a/tests/TestSuite_interrupt_pmd.py
+++ b/tests/TestSuite_interrupt_pmd.py
@@ -106,19 +106,20 @@ class TestInterruptPmd(TestCase):
         """
         Send a packet to port
         """
+        self.tester.send_expect("scapy", ">>>", 30)
         for i in range(len(self.dut_ports[:portnum])):
             for j in range(num):
                 txport = self.tester.get_local_port(self.dut_ports[i])
                 mac = self.dut.get_mac_address(self.dut_ports[i])
                 txItf = self.tester.get_interface(txport)
-                self.tester.scapy_append(
-                    'sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="198.0.0.%d")/UDP()/Raw(\'X\'*18)], iface="%s")' % (j, txItf))
-                self.tester.scapy_execute()
+                self.tester.send_expect('sendp([Ether()/IP(dst="198.0.0.%d")/UDP()/Raw(\'X\'*18)], iface="%s")' % (j, txItf), ">>>")
+        self.tester.send_expect("quit()", "#", 30)
 
     def tear_down(self):
         """
         Run after each test case.
         """
+        self.dut.kill_all()
         pass
 
     def tear_down_all(self):
-- 
2.17.1


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-27  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26 17:18 Wenjie Li
2019-11-26  8:34 ` Li, WenjieX A
2019-11-27  8:53 ` Ma, LihongX [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BE1E572D0441E34284F1F8B7AC28F1970BB295D2@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=lihongx.ma@intel.com \
    --cc=dts@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wenjiex.a.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).