From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47428A0032; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:44:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF104114A; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:44:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-ot1-f46.google.com (mail-ot1-f46.google.com [209.85.210.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7F640C35 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 14:44:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ot1-f46.google.com with SMTP id t4-20020a05683022e400b00591aaf48277so10040542otc.13 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:44:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7NY+fMOjPOXQdpRci5TqVdYXgtCguHfubQ+iUDTncZw=; b=MDcjAH1ORx9SR+eU+tH+2oQk0WS8Qd54TQsTKZ8Pr5Ro0XhDEHhYfpyvt29HhwnT2l +3Li+rus6zcYYA8rU+GoBaNTRQYYdrKHO60lpngxwdb0Wv6a5webkmQbtfT1HXsKd5/R ohjOwsLjeve/jQSBxmc+w4Wb2sX1gnH2ZLlq8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7NY+fMOjPOXQdpRci5TqVdYXgtCguHfubQ+iUDTncZw=; b=WDDFH9X3Oh+Ms3Wfzny/75xNpzrlj+EGr8Wtyv+mI8kZmmesm13eAVQSKbo9qKT/ap ciZUKdhS2ElTVUixTnHUAxNbZwiBBPeUywcffZXS/ha13kphKPj1eKuEZW1PpeRBTPDb GwhHiivVOSTTKD6cnIqrgejCBf5HgFcx2CmkT8Se2Q/d6UFZ6pFMA97354p89R2X548u aarYHztRTe3Ys6AiALqw/SOo924x2AACWE7lDWVKCbmOyuUClQhh3ewpWXHEjEPTIITw vZhFq4fq0VWjFjQZO7xf8ayHuXcWkokE7yO7GLqyEUDpK8fCr2ZStmNhqT6DakuXywRI 1lWw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53153LbVpKGzdFum1xV/CfxurvbjGUZFPF0HQ4TUfNSgTaD1nvVq d8naSFg9DwtkLUP2IDf6v8EhqWqHAMcIo0WDwdPR+A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxC5lMDo09ljkV3JxM6C3NdhqjpWtZcitVzcpmMxNp722Iq5E4rozs/S+a5X0ZD++v+0n8aC8lYrLhoGZVcmMo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1182:: with SMTP id u2mr4413559otq.322.1642167886937; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:44:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1639130270-232144-1-git-send-email-junx.dong@intel.com> <282c3927290f4e32bb893f6119f5777c@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <282c3927290f4e32bb893f6119f5777c@intel.com> From: Owen Hilyard Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 08:44:11 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH V1] framework/*: Add function to support ASan test To: "Tu, Lijuan" Cc: "Dong, JunX" , "dts@dpdk.org" , "Ling, WeiX" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009012ac05d58b01d2" X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000009012ac05d58b01d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I think that using the filter_bounds approach makes sense. Also, if we are open to adding other sanitizers, UBSAN might be fairly easy to add, since it should be in roughly the same format as ASAN and LSAN. --0000000000009012ac05d58b01d2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think that using the filter_bounds appr= oach makes sense.=C2=A0

Also, if we are open to adding o= ther sanitizers, UBSAN might be fairly easy to add, since it should be in r= oughly the same format as ASAN and LSAN.
--0000000000009012ac05d58b01d2--