Greetings Xu, Yes seems like I have had used only one port - let me re-run by making the necessary changes in ports.cfg and get back with the observations. @ Lijuan Tu, Please find the answers in-line. Thanks & Regards, Chengappa From: Xu, GangX [mailto:gangx.xu@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 7:12 AM To: M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) ; dts@dpdk.org Subject: RE: low pass rate executing dts complete test suite Hi Chengappa: How many ports do you use? In the information you provided, I think you used only one port. Many of the case in dts need two ports or more. e.g. test suite pmd_bonded need 4 ports, you provide 1, it failed at set_up_all show "blocked set_up_all failed" issue. Xu gang From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tu, Lijuan Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 9:49 PM To: M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) >; dts@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dts] low pass rate executing dts complete test suite Hi chengappa, Here are my points: 1, the link might have some issues, such as link down From the result "receive 0 , expect 64", I think , the link is down You can check your link first before running dts. [Chengappa] sure, will check on this, thank you for the inputs. 2, DPDK will change during different version , so DTS will change with it. Which DPDK and DTS 's version do you use? From the failed result "set up failed" and timeout , I think your testpmd started failed. Logs in output, you can check them to find the real reason, maybe testpmd's parameters changed. [Chengappa] Am using DPDK 18.02 with DTS 17.08.0, kindly let me know if there are any issues with the combination am using or version mismatch here? With the log traces I was able to see that the testpmd failed to start - is there anything that I need to tweak to change the testpmd's parameters to be changed? From: dts [mailto:dts-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of M R, Chengappa (Network Function Virtualization) Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 7:28 PM To: dts@dpdk.org Subject: [dts] low pass rate executing dts complete test suite Hello DTS community, As we were investigation on DTS for Niantic (Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit) platform and we are seeing very less pass rate. We were under the assumption if we take care of the initial pre-requisites for TESTER and TARGET DUT as described here - https://dpdk.org/doc/dts/gsg/sys_reqs.html the DTS framework help us achieve a good pass rate. Could you please help me by letting know if there are any fine tuning for the TARGET DUT so that I can see a better numbers than the current pass rate of 12.4% [root@tester dts]# cat output/statistics.txt Passed = 17 Failed = 45 Blocked = 68 Pass rate = 12.4 Some of the specification on the TARGET DUT and current running configuration are as follows [root@targetdut ~]# lspci | egrep -i --color 'network|ethernet' 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect NIC (Skyhawk) (rev 10) 04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Emulex Corporation OneConnect NIC (Skyhawk) (rev 10) 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) 05:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) [root@tester dts]# cat conf/ports.cfg # DUT Port Configuration # [DUT IP] # ports= # pci=Pci BDF,intf=Kernel interface; # pci=Pci BDF,mac=Mac address,peer=Tester Pci BDF,numa=Port Numa # pci=Pci BDF,peer=IXIA:card.port # pci=Pci BDF,peer=Tester Pci BDF,tp_ip=$(IP),tp_path=$({PERL_PATH); # pci=Pci BDF,peer=Tester Pci BDF,sec_port=yes,first_port=Pci BDF; # [VM NAME] virtual machine name; This section is for virutal scenario # ports = # dev_idx=device index of ports info, peer=Tester Pci BDF [10.70.2.6] ports = pci=05:00.0,intf=ens2f0; pci=05:00.1,intf=ens2f1; [root@tester dts]# cat executions/execution.cfg [Execution1] crbs=10.70.2.6 drivername=igb_uio test_suites=hello_world test_suites= cmdline, hello_world targets=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc parameters=nic_type=niantic:func=true [root@tester dts]# cat conf/crbs.cfg #DUT crbs Configuration #[DUT IP] # dut_ip: DUT ip address # dut_user: Login DUT username # dut_passwd: Login DUT password # os: operation system type linux or freebsd # tester_ip: Tester ip address # tester_passwd: Tester password # ixia_group: IXIA group name # channels: Board channel number # bypass_core0: Whether by pass core0 [10.70.2.6] dut_ip=10.70.2.6 dut_user=root dut_passwd=HP1nvent os=linux tester_ip=10.70.2.5 tester_passwd=HP1nvent channels=4 Snippet of the current results [cid:image001.png@01D3F1A6.300ADDC0] [cid:image002.png@01D3F1A6.300ADDC0] [cid:image003.png@01D3F1A6.300ADDC0] [cid:image004.png@01D3F1A6.300ADDC0] Thanking in advance, Chengappa If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself....!!