From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38386A0562; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:49:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECF7140F33; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:49:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4648D140F2C for ; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:49:44 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: Lk1DQRRb8s4qHUFAUkNPQGyhrUFlR+pU2njTZlIOOiLHmhNHlF0/ukly/IJgj1o9uzUYCnzHfg hKnk4Sygn8Gw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9927"; a="253860245" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,261,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="253860245" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Mar 2021 01:49:42 -0700 IronPort-SDR: jrGDy72Bq4Z6e8g4wp7dBS2OKTfGecu5358cg28ewFOUsvNGwxFMSJ8k2bHoB4Cp4ihzgJEurc VaeLKDlApjpA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,261,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="603072820" Received: from fmsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.85]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2021 01:49:42 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by fmsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 01:49:41 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:49:40 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:49:40 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Zhao, HaiyangX" , "dts@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dts][PATCH V2 0/5] framework: add a proposal of recognizing pkgs Thread-Index: AQHXG9lwJ00T93XtpEmFq1kWuiJPH6qLAcoA Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 08:49:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20210318092215.27270-1-haiyangx.zhao@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210318092215.27270-1-haiyangx.zhao@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V2 0/5] framework: add a proposal of recognizing pkgs X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > v2: > fix exception when get pkg info. > v1: >=20 > Now there are os default/comms/wireless pkgs for CVL NIC, and they supp= ort > different protocals. Some suite like l2tp_esp_coverage are partly support= these > pkgs, we replace the pkg in suite to support the case in the past, but th= is may > occur exception and the result may not be we want, so we provide a new > proposal by adding a decorate above test case to check if the pkg support > current case, and do not replace pkg in suite. >=20 > This patch set is the proposal of framework modification. >=20 > Haiyang Zhao (5): > framework/exception: add new exception VerifySkip > framework/test_case: handle the VerifySkip exception and add some > functions > nics/net_device: add attribute pkg and get method > framework/dut: get nic package in dut prerequisites > tests: add nic and pkg check for rss_gtpu Applied, thanks