From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C23BA0547; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693DF4068F; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:35:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9104068E for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 05:35:01 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10121"; a="222962723" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,331,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="222962723" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Sep 2021 20:35:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,331,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="587813622" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2021 20:35:00 -0700 Received: from shsmsx602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.12; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 20:34:59 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2242.12; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:34:57 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.012; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:34:57 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Jiale, SongX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Jiale, SongX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/cvl_dcf_switch_filter_gtpu: modify the execution order of sub cases Thread-Index: AQHXoIqQ08BIHkXQ00CcDLQYp2Mwbau6hMvA Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 03:34:57 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1630650226-212245-1-git-send-email-songx.jiale@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1630650226-212245-1-git-send-email-songx.jiale@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.6.200.16 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/cvl_dcf_switch_filter_gtpu: modify the execution order of sub cases X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" > -----Original Message----- > From: dts On Behalf Of Jiale Song > Sent: 2021=1B$BG/=1B(B9=1B$B7n=1B(B3=1B$BF|=1B(B 14:24 > To: dts@dpdk.org > Cc: Jiale, SongX > Subject: [dts] [PATCH V1] tests/cvl_dcf_switch_filter_gtpu: modify the ex= ecution > order of sub cases >=20 > Because creating rules of the same type will cause rule creation fail, ad= justing > the order of the sub cases can avoid this problem >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jiale Song Applied, thanks