From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC9FA052A; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:19:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC964137D; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:19:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06464F64 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:19:09 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: aXVaDoKtshjzSyHRjE1eCbjv83jF3F+n78ymswAUg3vStNjYOBRABccKI88pScPqSsDMMlCCRM 8SxM0wm6Bl7Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9801"; a="231712662" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="231712662" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2020 19:19:01 -0800 IronPort-SDR: C+X6zJQQSn5jbLsR03ZGRUzEm3hQoDaSBHO6JD1mJu+aMsOVmS9Q7zpwj4jX+UjYkzxBOKrXZc H5XVq/EerePA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,468,1596524400"; d="scan'208";a="356442893" Received: from fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.83]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2020 19:19:01 -0800 Received: from shsmsx602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) by fmsmsx603.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:19:00 -0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX602.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:18:58 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:18:58 +0800 From: "Tu, Lijuan" To: "Sun, QinX" , "dts@dpdk.org" CC: "Sun, QinX" Thread-Topic: [dts] [PATCH V1 0/3] add test suite cvl_limit_value_test Thread-Index: AQHWskyTz4/tF5BejUC1Oqlktuf186nCTgSw Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:18:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201104102528.6880-1-qinx.sun@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201104102528.6880-1-qinx.sun@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dts] [PATCH V1 0/3] add test suite cvl_limit_value_test X-BeenThere: dts@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: test suite reviews and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dts-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dts" >=20 > These 8 cases take a long time to run, so split them from 3 already exist= ed >=20 > suites (iavf_fdir, cvl_fdir, cvl_dcf_switch_filter) and make them as a ne= w test > suite >=20 > sunqin (3): > test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test: add test plan > tests/cvl_limit_value_test: add cvl_limit test suite > conf/cvl_limit_value_test: add config file for new test suite >=20 > conf/cvl_limit_value_test.cfg | 5 + > test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test_test_plan.rst | 594 ++++++++++++ > tests/TestSuite_cvl_limit_value_test.py | 917 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 1516 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 conf/cvl_limit_value_test.cfg create mode 100644 > test_plans/cvl_limit_value_test_test_plan.rst > create mode 100644 tests/TestSuite_cvl_limit_value_test.py >=20 Applied, thanks