From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5A5F72 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:26:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id f82so61326622wmf.1 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 05:26:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Klgi4oCZL51ERlgbdvHJNG56pR2Vd9JG8zF9fDJvNT4=; b=A0IF/xkhRWI7r0IaoRzOdunl4BcBsch4juPajvWZaQQi9zzwBLt5sdISHstGkoCsWT tFgsMwJeIcT1jxabpfOfVpQHUvIhHx2X2sB788iRsM8b0j615IpwHBE7oNapjXyfiysG 7hiaD0uGm11cXElybhYEuitrM6G5KKSi+nh6rrzr4iZxmAcIlMamvH4dilttlv557KaJ yUM169HqmRFXJhtrNxI41D/6/2MM25tGOVSPSt3u9661vZTPODCJ30eB1ZWXTAFbhtO7 aqj3uFYJ5pKwrgb+VoeE1V/1czHgOGrPQ2cSMPDslxh0HSs/yUbksG0K/oet+bA8SWPY a5iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Klgi4oCZL51ERlgbdvHJNG56pR2Vd9JG8zF9fDJvNT4=; b=N+/LOEfg+L8A8Fv1pyqQ/SKj/jI/sUZ3NRFXcqmsB//t0b3d9P7OtSx1ANk4InjlMF nHr3AhNyhnOTi3DnKBThugL2erP1ljfwEiQ4pNZsx1T4xD6vj3ewEcP89lpPX+k3buUP cGSXkgF4291B2wlhNrCdoOrxzsihYsabr1XJdpoicVYjyIcHaQsBstKuOKa2lT9HNow1 x/QA5vcNaYge1F6raiArorXq4mSj62X/Fikmo8t1wH+tihL7hXWwOCvhZw3J+0g90FZJ b89EzqBR/C47/oiG7jAUmuBLzij5fhIlkxm3hqETsz01qFZxeWn8g2X3JqvafCa9BB8Z xXkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00WjyHqg3gFlvJ8SREl7896aEDuSO3NqxP5cTB3/FynceyWhm9QRoc9Zc0A0bAxuUde X-Received: by 10.28.226.139 with SMTP id z133mr2609104wmg.139.1479994005095; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 05:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xu5sm41753148wjc.49.2016.11.24.05.26.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 05:26:44 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Dave Neary Cc: moving@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:26:43 +0100 Message-ID: <1540534.G53vByIeVs@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67623D9E@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67622717@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <583617A4.4000400@redhat.com> <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67623D9E@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Reminder on Today's Meeting and Updated Charter X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:26:45 -0000 2016-11-24 12:46, O'Driscoll, Tim: > From: Dave Neary [mailto:dneary@redhat.com] > > Fourthly, do we need to make a distinction between DPDK the software > > project and the DPDK Project, the entity which will come into being > > under the LF? I ask, because participation in the DPDK software project > > is clearly not to be limited to paying members, while participation in > > the DPDK Project under the LF is limited to paying companies, for the > > most part. > > The aim was that this was clear from point 4.a in the Membership section. At last week's meeting somebody (Matt I think) suggested adding a membership category of Contributor to make this clearer, but most people felt this was over-kill. > > Do you think this is clear from point 4.a, or do you still think something further is required? I think the membership section must be part of the governing board section. So it makes clear that we are talking about members of the governing board.