From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f178.google.com (mail-wj0-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B963B5 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:50:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f178.google.com with SMTP id v7so145673586wjy.2 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:50:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o5J16cJgY+SMpCztcrHC+bQWVpKULlbM6Mup/Nz0Ers=; b=pF7BcrN0E2ccGyuxaVcHiM0f9g6MHxSyMxKKIFlvEbaHWek/DHrtrQ/sG2jebCT/5R fkbplUxLJJwUeO9UeD6+badI76N0CWABsFhbKpELXdytJbt6qaRnNuMggtEKWDe2Q9eK r7JNh3FJbh7f/dlBOJLxWMX/QrFjzlQCjZfW30v6W5ySHw15ANQFwawtYxhNPxbhxy3P +SHXAdAHU4FVMP+FNr2ZUjie6UsOgITMzlHRY2iB8i1vmXkfYA6aQwW/W0SO/3pc5l1f U6HRvG9yTAC7beCNxhv+nkhA9NHr++fmcyPXisrqcu7CFB7UOFQaWHruq1WgPcEPh9VT D/QA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o5J16cJgY+SMpCztcrHC+bQWVpKULlbM6Mup/Nz0Ers=; b=CNV1bJBFxqec8La5nRor0wVAXlDRWCdEw0cskVMxTHOYXBqP7AyOxLgMEBusvYSdMg DKEL69RpTJkA1NaNWKIV0jxhldFi+ACh0l+DgHNFDYptDWo/q2iPxBVbtm52+Weh1t41 K7OIIfhsFXpWRI9M0cOG/8snpT5JouqmZ17T6J3NrXnrMh8AoQC4VkhrdO9urVYqEyDj SHRk6tRzoeTBGNvWGcSetVIKPWf5yOzk8GIZJiiPjJJX+SSZiPpReC94a0KwzrukzJTm jH3Qv4ubHf8yh/RtE6Ur18N8JS7pyVTcts0I/BoJgutZoETft0/zd89Fgv0XL59d7XtT NrPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC038W5gHd1XN7jW1bQ0HKapzTM3w4Xvb/HOyn0kscBfd2qjXrMO9hGIPDfPiY5R54frK X-Received: by 10.194.14.73 with SMTP id n9mr26139155wjc.189.1480427451252; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:50:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c133sm2946210wme.12.2016.11.29.05.50.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 05:50:50 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Francois Ozog Cc: Matt Spencer , "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Dave Neary , moving@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:50:49 +0100 Message-ID: <1582367.tENoNDAmhm@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67622717@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Reminder on Today's Meeting and Updated Charter X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:50:51 -0000 2016-11-29 14:20, Francois Ozog: > Hi Matt, > > I coy/paste Mike Dolan's comment on CLA: > > "Most of our projects use the Apache CCLA if a CLA is required. We have a > fully automated e-signature management system for CLA signings. You can see > the CCLA for Kubernetes for example here: > https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/content/cncf-corporate-contributor-license-agreement > > " > > I had Linaro member companie lawyers have a look at it and they said it is > fine. > > So it should be nice to have such CCLA in place in DPDK. Why?