Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees

[Vincent Jardin <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2334 bytes --]

No, it will fragment again and even more the communications. Please, use 
this mailing list if you need to voice some arguments.


Le 18 janvier 2017 6:20:07 PM George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com> a écrit :

> Cool,  count me in if we have quorum.
>
> George
>
> From: Michael Dolan [mailto:mdolan@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:15 AM
> To: George Zhao
> Cc: Vincent JARDIN; O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh; Ed 
> Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees
>
> I can explore finding a room if there will be enough people present. Who 
> plans to be there?
>
>
> ---
> Mike Dolan
> VP of Strategic Programs
> The Linux Foundation
> Office: +1.330.460.3250   Cell: +1.440.552.5322  Skype: michaelkdolan
> mdolan@linuxfoundation.org<mailto:mdolan@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, George Zhao 
> <George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com<mailto:George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com>> wrote:
> Question: Will there be a f2f discussion of this topic during Open source 
> leadership summit by Linux foundation?
>
> Thanks,
> George
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: moving 
> [mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org<mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org>] On Behalf 
> Of Vincent JARDIN
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 3:46 PM
> To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh
> Cc: Michael Dolan; Ed Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org<mailto:moving@dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees
> Le 17/01/2017 à 23:28, O'Driscoll, Tim a écrit :
>> "I said that Red Hat is happy with the technical operation of the
>> project, and we don't want to see the community disrupted with toolset
>> changes - and it's possible to work with projects like fd.io<http://fd.io>, 
>> OVS, and
>> OPNFV to do testing of DPDK.
>>
>> Representatives from Brocade, Cavium, and Linaro all voiced a preference
>> for a stand-alone lightweight project"
>
> +1 too
>
> DPDK is consumed by many projects and it was proven to be a successful
> model. By launching DPDK.org, 6WIND wanted to stimulate DPDK to be a
> reference for many consumers of IOs (FD.io, ovs-dpdk, moongen, ostinato,
> etc.) on any HW.
>
> Since day 1 of DPDK.org, DPDK allows to sustain any innovations because
> of a strong intent to be agnostic.
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6176 bytes --]