No, it will fragment again and even more the communications. Please, use this mailing list if you need to voice some arguments. Le 18 janvier 2017 6:20:07 PM George Zhao a écrit : > Cool, count me in if we have quorum. > > George > > From: Michael Dolan [mailto:mdolan@linuxfoundation.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:15 AM > To: George Zhao > Cc: Vincent JARDIN; O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh; Ed > Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees > > I can explore finding a room if there will be enough people present. Who > plans to be there? > > > --- > Mike Dolan > VP of Strategic Programs > The Linux Foundation > Office: +1.330.460.3250 Cell: +1.440.552.5322 Skype: michaelkdolan > mdolan@linuxfoundation.org > --- > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, George Zhao > > wrote: > Question: Will there be a f2f discussion of this topic during Open source > leadership summit by Linux foundation? > > Thanks, > George > > -----Original Message----- > From: moving > [mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf > Of Vincent JARDIN > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 3:46 PM > To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh > Cc: Michael Dolan; Ed Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees > Le 17/01/2017 à 23:28, O'Driscoll, Tim a écrit : >> "I said that Red Hat is happy with the technical operation of the >> project, and we don't want to see the community disrupted with toolset >> changes - and it's possible to work with projects like fd.io, >> OVS, and >> OPNFV to do testing of DPDK. >> >> Representatives from Brocade, Cavium, and Linaro all voiced a preference >> for a stand-alone lightweight project" > > +1 too > > DPDK is consumed by many projects and it was proven to be a successful > model. By launching DPDK.org, 6WIND wanted to stimulate DPDK to be a > reference for many consumers of IOs (FD.io, ovs-dpdk, moongen, ostinato, > etc.) on any HW. > > Since day 1 of DPDK.org, DPDK allows to sustain any innovations because > of a strong intent to be agnostic. > >