From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941AD5598 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:44:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id t79so88347553wmt.0 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:44:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wa5kq6yCu1NAExtmImVwkNl7qoBb4djcpijx9+b9GQk=; b=aaVWpUvyr9WWmy7gvtcLK/pPVID+3sppl1piN0UxbSt0lCo6de9ObCybnmUBGWQ9NE IHi4UGFkYyOpPKEs9ygR5s7EpC4uP9giMbgC/ZufKpd4xIAXPh7Y2kIlOrP2nyrYuV5G USSX/Jkaf2u72e+K1rRkR7hX+oT3UOgjXQEg1lnZgTf0/2Ci1JPb/8c6KCPsGnaKhyRd 1yaskxLb9gM/WJgkKk36xKUfNiS7J1xSKk3OAgamCT9tX/72BIfdzSN/7u8u5hqMnOuX UqTQIprQrh16e/fDQfap3gMlENK7wvQGg5ZU2c4w+E44MInEFH99fREDmtbiIdwTEF3v NBbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wa5kq6yCu1NAExtmImVwkNl7qoBb4djcpijx9+b9GQk=; b=CgOxceOjKpxSZKEDKHRkJH2MeG1AzkprWPmo54H20SVOhR9+wLhTOPykwbmTROy+Mp WvFMvrg8bY8rA7GzlmQzJey0tjWjOzK9buYwyoeyFb9itvXt86G+dMp5I8ne31Uz7/bW Ph5kJvgH6sXkqbLaqBialXq7NJ/2x5eNPPuePEI/KRVwTM0Eg5L22kl6k60EYVgAv4wE 4xkn8tsSpRvVAlPzCVVjW3yckNugYwcXElB9XzFkaY0jNp85vjxd2jtVbbeKAFN7qK+4 7zc5Gyon8uqu9huAPWeFLPfsAbvu7LE5XIKtnsfaC0sTd6QIfn0JxZrkJKZ7AJs3YRAl l/fA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcfn+DewBe4E8726z8DBh65RBQmvpKmXqi+1576Cw+trvluUwbsBdcR5KZZktlJ5LtR X-Received: by 10.194.90.135 with SMTP id bw7mr2681655wjb.34.1479318289285; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id yj10sm41562123wjb.3.2016.11.16.09.44.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:44:48 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" Cc: moving@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:44:47 +0100 Message-ID: <1712528.kSnG0XNraU@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA676143A8@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA676143A8@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Board Names X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:44:49 -0000 2016-11-16 16:50, O'Driscoll, Tim: > For the board itself, there are several options including: > 1.a Governing Board. This is frequently used in other LF projects. > 1.b Board of Directors. This is also frequently used in other LF projects. > 1.c DPDK Board. This is a bit more neutral and doesn't imply that the board governs the technical aspects of the project. > 1.d DPDK Marketing & CI Board. This is more specific, but is a bit misleading as the board only manages the budget for CI, not all aspects of CI. I do not like 1.a, 1.b and 1.c because it is not descriptive enough. We must avoid giving the impression that the technical part of the project is influenced by those paying a membership. Why not simply one these new proposals? 1.e Budget Board 1.f Financial Board > For the technical board, the options include: > 2.a Technical Board. This is the current name. > 2.b Technical Steering Committee. This is the name typically used on other LF projects. OK for both