From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595C0106A for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:50:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g23so240135204wme.1 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:50:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jNjFQ/j5w1QULIHbtg5PamnGXfbaD0by1hAWMdYiJR8=; b=YqwVNIcAVgLsrc40/DgCC9g7VOBMLhQAeCnQx87GnjlhFzPqg+fDR4cbgQYSTHDELF enSRU1ggDl664d4lxunj1ullJE07RmsZa1d3Mf/uHIHZwMb27gVRGrVjOjsl03EsuNes hHZixlYH1EDezd3utCXl8AL+cOICzL5Y+c/BjEtXUTFiYnMD9ffnj/XKDbmXYukJIp4A W/hCXtuA/tEd7xBb3b5xB3GtrIlSi6hWejgXyK+N2y7QJ5uTHBs/aqqk28fSffX8J3Qk mEAIb6SqCvH2P4A+jZLr7ZJGhyeRXsNDyig9wD5I11ZRO6anUvNG2VhipSV+HAx8KxGN u3lA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jNjFQ/j5w1QULIHbtg5PamnGXfbaD0by1hAWMdYiJR8=; b=Q5PF3HuictLDVnE7yfYDBy5/ttg68S5zRz4Iz44EEqO0CDf2C+CTBOY6CX/Acko+6l 1pZoNqDaEFv5US3HWM1wUvGGC5H7nL4oiZI2q93a6oncugBdG0A3DUyf3pwtHAN7ypvu Peo9Dwt015z0Ygn1ZZyFiGAIxZOFVwIFiW3fmm+d+kNx6R5AYwBqzk7i5kMd9zfH0vfi JN8fG+FSZ5a3RX+ugZhU2/S76CxKfmbtndCXSse4UhrC3Z7MxL2zqSOsTuU3rKucSDxB FlrvXT85SPZX3lkOAwBsjMGet17ligxnNKefCpUadeqgEBODnaWJa6dXhlvDUEEt4mB6 /G6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00GhyrThfIEo4UgjYWQiZ44WLhTYYjV2G5ooO33RtrTprvnvhYuilqxScaOPr39RyjE X-Received: by 10.28.54.214 with SMTP id y83mr119252wmh.45.1480431055064; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:50:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:f5b1:e421:4c5f:fd3a? ([2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:f5b1:e421:4c5f:fd3a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w7sm3152301wmd.24.2016.11.29.06.50.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Nov 2016 06:50:54 -0800 (PST) To: Francois Ozog , Matt Spencer References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA67622717@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <1582367.tENoNDAmhm@xps13> Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Dave Neary , moving@dpdk.org From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <1a5796a5-2ca1-acd1-85bf-651948044bae@6wind.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:50:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Reminder on Today's Meeting and Updated Charter X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:50:55 -0000 Matt, Fifo, > On 29 November 2016 at 14:50, Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > 2016-11-29 14:20, Francois Ozog: > > Hi Matt, > > > > I coy/paste Mike Dolan's comment on CLA: > > > > "Most of our projects use the Apache CCLA if a CLA is required. We have a > > fully automated e-signature management system for CLA signings. You can see > > the CCLA for Kubernetes for example here: > > https://identity.linuxfoundation.org/content/cncf-corporate-contributor-license-agreement > > > > " > > > > I had Linaro member companie lawyers have a look at it and they said it is > > fine. > > > > So it should be nice to have such CCLA in place in DPDK. > > Why? > > > In an early mail I said: It is useless argument. We are not making any progress on it. Assuming the technical folks do not want to change the current git+review+sign-off process by adding extra paper work, does it mean that Linaro and ARM cannot contribute do DPDK? I feel we are beating a non issue here. Thank you, Vincent