From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EBB2BDD for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:24:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2016 03:24:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,309,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="39420957" Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.31]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2016 03:24:20 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.159]) by IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:23:27 +0000 From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" To: "moving@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Today's Meeting Thread-Index: AdJPsvrrkUVsjL1LQ7WydIw9sIcBmQ== Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:23:27 +0000 Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA72279643@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiZDM3ODBiZTUtMTEzNy00NTg4LTk2NjAtODdmYWNkOGMwOWI0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjIuMTEuMCIsIlRydXN0ZWRMYWJlbEhhc2giOiJucGsrTGNuck40VlBGbW9HMGN4ZjZvZ1IwUFl3MTNFYjVvenJUanV4NEJFPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-moving] Today's Meeting X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:24:22 -0000 A reminder that today's meeting is at 3pm GMT, 4pm CET, 10am EST, 7am PST. = Access numbers are: France: +33 1588 77298 UK: +44 179340 2663 USA: +1 916 356 2663=09 Bridge Number: 5 Conference ID: 94641018 Link to Skype meeting: https://meet.intel.com/tim.odriscoll/G7H113HY Project Charter: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x43ycfW3arJNX-e6NQt3OV= zAuNXtD7dppIhrY48FoGs Minutes from last week's meeting: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-N= ovember/000099.html Items that we should cover today include: - We need to decide how we're going to proceed on the suggested adoption of= a CLA and/or license change in order to provide patent protection. We have= two options: a) Agree that this is not within the scope of the initiative to move the pr= oject to the LF. The project charter will document the current process (BSD= license and DCO). Once a Governing Board is in place, anybody can propose = adoption of a CLA and/or a change in license, and the board will review and= agree on how to proceed. b) We ask the LF to facilitate separate meetings on this involving legal co= unsel from the major contributors to the project. - For voting, the current draft of the charter specifies a quorum of 50% fo= r the GB (see 3.1.3) and TB (3.2.3) for a meeting to proceed. Thomas sugges= ted on the mailing list that the quorum for the TB should be higher. We sho= uld agree on the right percentage. - For Membership (section 4) we need to agree whether membership relates to= the project or just to the GB. There are a couple of comments in the doc f= rom Vincent, and Thomas has raised the same issue on the mailing list as we= ll, saying that membership only applies to the GB. I'd viewed this differen= tly, that people became members of the project and that one of the benefits= is representation on the GB. We need to conclude on this. - A related issue that we need to conclude on is whether we need a Contribu= tor membership level as Matt has proposed (related to the CLA/DCO item abov= e). - For CI, good progress has been made on putting in place a distributed sol= ution as we discussed previously. For a centralized performance lab, Jaswin= der submitted a comment proposing a cap on the number of boards a gold memb= er can contribute, which seems reasonable. Matt added a comment saying that= the scope should allow software vendors to submit DPDK-enabled application= s to be run as part of the performance testing. Note that we don't need to = define the full scope of performance testing here as that can be done separ= ately. We just need to agree at a high level. - For Technical Governance (section 5), we need to agree how much of this s= hould be in the charter and how much should be maintained in the Contributo= r's Guidelines and/or DPDK.org Development page. I put some proposed text i= n the doc which links to the other docs that cover this. If we agree that's= the right approach then we don't need to discuss further. If we want more = detail in this doc, then Thomas has proposed some initial text and Keith an= d others have commented on this. - Where is the technical governance for apps that are not part of the DPDK = project documented? These are small, but it should still be captured somewh= ere. - At the moment, the IP Policy (section 6) says that everything is BSD lice= nsed. That's not strictly true as some small parts of DPDK use GPL or dual = BSD/GPL. We need to capture those existing exceptions somewhere, either in = this doc or in another location that we can link to.