From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9048137AF for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:54:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2017 03:54:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,253,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="55123604" Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2017 03:54:29 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.173]) by IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:52:45 +0000 From: "O'Driscoll, Tim" To: "moving@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, January 17th Thread-Index: AdJyRIzvlehAjW1TTv2c7GA1vpGzOQ== Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:52:45 +0000 Message-ID: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722AC191@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMjRmYzZiOTMtZjkzYS00NjA1LWJjMTQtNDA5NDA4OTE1OTIzIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE2LjIuMTEuMCIsIlRydXN0ZWRMYWJlbEhhc2giOiJYUkxCaTVNeXpDZU93ZEw2WTBFTEhsTXViUUE5dnI2ODBzWWV4MkNGQWtNPSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, January 17th X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:54:32 -0000 Here are my notes from Tuesday's call. Please feel free to correct any erro= rs or to add additional details. Attendees: Ed Warnicke (Cisco), Francois-Frederic Ozog (Linaro), Hemant Agr= awal (NXP), Jan Blunck (Brocade), Jaswinder Singh (NXP), John McNamara (Int= el), Keith Wiles (Intel), Kevin Traynor (Red Hat), Matt Spencer (ARM), Olga= Shern (Mellanox), Tim O'Driscoll (Intel), Vincent Jardin (6WIND). Firstly, here are some links to help keep track of things: Project Charter: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x43ycfW3arJNX-e6NQt3OV= zAuNXtD7dppIhrY48FoGs Summary of discussion at Userspace event in Dublin: http://dpdk.org/ml/arch= ives/dev/2016-October/049259.html Minutes of October 31st call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Novem= ber/000031.html Minutes of November 8th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Novem= ber/000058.html Minutes of November 15th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Nove= mber/000061.html Minutes of November 22nd call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Nove= mber/000085.html Minutes of November 29th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Nove= mber/000099.html Minutes of December 6th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Decem= ber/000121.html Minutes of December 13th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Dece= mber/000124.html Minutes of December 20th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-Dece= mber/000127.html Minutes of January 10th call: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2017-Janua= ry/000136.html Technical governance, including info on Maintainers and sub-trees: http://d= pdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/index.html & http://dpdk.org/dev. Reviewed the latest comments on the project charter. These were the signifi= cant discussion points: Discussed whether Governing Board meetings should be public: - Most other board meetings in similar open source projects are private. Pr= ojects such as OFP do issue public versions of meeting minutes, which are t= ypically >90% the same as the private version. - I proposed leaving the charter doc unchanged. As currently written, it do= es not require GB meetings to be public, but does not prevent the GB from h= aving public meetings if it chooses to do so in future. Most people (Ed, Ke= ith, Kevin, Jaswinder) agreed. Vincent disagreed. Vincent will consider the= issue again and see if there's another way to address his concerns. Reviewed 4.c and 4.d, which document that the GB will determine limits and = costs for hosting hardware in the lab, if and when a DPDK lab is set up. Re= moved proposed 4.e which proposed that the lab approach should be approved = by the Technical Board as this was considered an implementation detail. There was a reminder from Thomas for people interested in CI to register fo= r and contribute on the ci@dpdk.org mailing list. Discussed trademarks. Vincent proposed that we add text to the charter spec= ifying that there is no current trademark on "DPDK" and no plans to create = one. Agreed to leave the charter doc unchanged until Mike Dolan's discussio= ns on legal issues reach a conclusion on this as there may be other legal/t= rademark issues that we're missing. When we progress to membership discussions, the Linux Foundation will need = to discuss membership, membership levels, fees etc. with each potential mem= ber separately. We need to determine who the right point of contact is for = each potential member company. It should be somebody who has the authority = to commit that company to a specific DPDK membership level. We can start to= create a list of contact names at next week's meeting. Next Meeting: Tuesday January 24th at 3pm GMT, 4pm CET, 10am EST, 7am PST. We'll discuss = next steps for identifying membership rates, project members etc. We can al= so cover any remaining comments/concerns on the charter.