DPDK community structure changes
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>
To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>,
	Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	"moving@dpdk.org" <moving@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, December 20th
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:04:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <316115b3-35ee-d99b-6965-21b2b088aa76@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA72299670@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi,

On 12/21/2016 10:55 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote:
> 4. Membership:
> - Ed's guidance from FD.io was that the process of recruiting members could take up to 6 months. We have done a lot of prep work during these meetings so we hope to do it faster than this and will target 3 months. This would allow for a project launch in Q2. We'll use our first meeting in Jan to work out the next steps on this.
> - Potential member companies should make sure that their decision-makers for joining and funding DPDK are aware of these discussions and of the status of the charter doc.

It seems that if the review of the technical governance is now complete,
and the DPDK developer community (and in particular the current
technical board) is OK with any changes proposed, the biggest remaining
item will be the budget proposal and setting of membership fees.

Do we have some updated material from the Linux Foundation as a starting
point for that discussion?

Thanks,
Dave.

> Next Meeting:
> We'll resume again on Tuesday January 10th at 3pm GMT, 4pm CET, 10am EST, 7am PST. We'll cover any additional (and hopefully final) comments on the charter, and discuss next steps for determining project members.
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-11 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-21 15:55 O'Driscoll, Tim
2017-01-11  8:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-11 11:41   ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2017-01-11 13:04 ` Dave Neary [this message]
2017-01-11 13:09   ` Vincent JARDIN
2017-01-11 22:23     ` O'Driscoll, Tim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=316115b3-35ee-d99b-6965-21b2b088aa76@redhat.com \
    --to=dneary@redhat.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=moving@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).