From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDC569FC for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:04:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E9337E64; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-41-137.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-116-167.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.167]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0BD4F7F029703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:04:16 -0500 To: "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Kevin Traynor , "moving@dpdk.org" References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA72299670@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Dave Neary Message-ID: <316115b3-35ee-d99b-6965-21b2b088aa76@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:04:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA72299670@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, December 20th X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:04:16 -0000 Hi, On 12/21/2016 10:55 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > 4. Membership: > - Ed's guidance from FD.io was that the process of recruiting members could take up to 6 months. We have done a lot of prep work during these meetings so we hope to do it faster than this and will target 3 months. This would allow for a project launch in Q2. We'll use our first meeting in Jan to work out the next steps on this. > - Potential member companies should make sure that their decision-makers for joining and funding DPDK are aware of these discussions and of the status of the charter doc. It seems that if the review of the technical governance is now complete, and the DPDK developer community (and in particular the current technical board) is OK with any changes proposed, the biggest remaining item will be the budget proposal and setting of membership fees. Do we have some updated material from the Linux Foundation as a starting point for that discussion? Thanks, Dave. > Next Meeting: > We'll resume again on Tuesday January 10th at 3pm GMT, 4pm CET, 10am EST, 7am PST. We'll cover any additional (and hopefully final) comments on the charter, and discuss next steps for determining project members. > -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338