DPDK community structure changes
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>
To: Michael Dolan <mdolan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
Cc: "moving@dpdk.org" <moving@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, November 29th
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:55:01 -0500
Message-ID: <583F3CA5.7060803@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFV=PSFsFogPcb1CJ9=DhkpJzyo8CePQdGG6kP6S8cv=vaE_yg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Mike,

On 11/30/2016 12:39 PM, Michael Dolan wrote:
> Hi Tim, sorry I couldn't make it with a LF Board meeting conflict
> yesterday. As for 1), most/all of our projects facing this issue decide
> to go Apache 2. A CLA is less preferably particularly with the BSD
> license. Where we do use a CLA on a project it's usually the same as the
> Apache CCLA/ICLA and that combined with the BSD license will I'm fairly
> certain not achieve what Linaro legal is probably concerned about.

A follow-on question: Has the Linux Foundation ever taken on a BSD
licensed project in the past? Given that the project has an existing
history and license, a license change might be a more involved change
(both practically and culturally) than the technical community woiuld be
prepared for.

> Just some thoughts on how other projects tackled this question. It would
> probably be best if we push any further discussion on this to a small
> group of your legal counsel as the various levers have different
> implications and I'm uncomfortable continuing this discussion without
> your counsel being involved.

Hopefully an answer specifically about what has been done in the past
would be OK - I understand you don't want to get into the area of advice
here.

Thanks,
Dave.

> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:01 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim
> <tim.odriscoll@intel.com <mailto:tim.odriscoll@intel.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Here are my notes from Tuesday's call. Please feel free to correct
>     any errors or to add additional details.
> 
>     Attendees: Dave Neary (Red Hat), Ed Warnicke (Cisco),
>     Francois-Frederic Ozog (Linaro), Hemant Agrawal (NXP), Jan Blunck
>     (Brocade), Jaswinder Singh (NXP), Jerin Jacob (Cavium), Jim St.
>     Leger (Intel), John McNamara (Intel), Keith Wiles (Intel), Olga
>     Shern (Mellanox), Thomas Monjalon (6WIND), Tim O'Driscoll (Intel),
>     Vincent Jardin (6WIND). Note that there may have been others, but as
>     people joined at different times it was difficult to keep track.
> 
>     Firstly, here are some links to help keep track of things:
>     Project Charter:
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x43ycfW3arJNX-e6NQt3OVzAuNXtD7dppIhrY48FoGs
>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x43ycfW3arJNX-e6NQt3OVzAuNXtD7dppIhrY48FoGs>
>     Summary of discussion at Userspace event in Dublin:
>     http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-October/049259.html
>     <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-October/049259.html>
>     Minutes of October 31st call:
>     http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000031.html
>     <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000031.html>
>     Minutes of November 8th call:
>     http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000058.html
>     <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000058.html>
>     Minutes of November 15th call:
>     http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000061.html
>     <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000061.html>
>     Minutes of November 22nd call:
>     http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000085.html
>     <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/moving/2016-November/000085.html>
>     Current technical governance, including composition of the Tech
>     Board: http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/index.html
>     <http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/index.html> &
>     http://dpdk.org/dev.
> 
> 
>     1. Discussed Contributor License Agreement (CLA) vs Developer
>     Certificate of Origin (DCO)
>     - Current process is to use a DCO.
>     - Francois-Frederic proposed using a CLA. This is based on input
>     from the Linaro legal team and some Linaro members who have
>     indicated that not having a CLA prevents them contributing to or
>     using DPDK.
>     - Discussed what benefit they think they'll get from CLA. The main
>     thing it adds is patent protection. This could be achieved in other
>     ways, for example using the Apache 2.0 license. Neither solution
>     would apply to existing DPDK code though so any benefit would only
>     apply to new code.
>     - Vincent asked if there are problems with other BSD licensed
>     projects. We agreed to check with the Linux Foundation (Mike Dolan)
>     to see if they have any guidance based on other BSD licensed
>     projects. I'll ask Mike.
> 
>     2. Discussed comments on project charter
>     - Agreed that the Governing Board does not specify requirements for
>     the Technical Board to implement. The two boards are peers. One can
>     make suggestions to the other at any time, but these aren't
>     requirements and don't have to be accepted.
>     - Discussed how members are added to/removed from the Technical
>     Board. Agreed that the TB approves adding/removing members. Agreed
>     that the TB needs to consider technical contributions from the
>     individuals and support for all architectures when making these
>     decisions.
>     - Discussed Dave's proposal for a representative of the technical
>     community on the GB (in addition to the rep from the TB). Agreed not
>     to do this and just to keep the single rep from the TB on the GB.
>     Also discussed whether there should be a GB rep on the TB and agreed
>     that this did not make sense.
>     - For voting, agreed that the quorum for a meeting for either board
>     is 50% of the members. Majority required to pass a vote is 50% of
>     the total board except for: a) changes to the charter require 2/3 of
>     the GB; b) licensing exceptions require 2/3 of the GB.
>     - I've updated the charter (section 3 - Project Governance) to
>     reflect these changes.
> 
> 
>     Next Meeting:
>     Tuesday December 6th at 3pm GMT, 4pm CET, 10am EST, 7am PST. We'll
>     focus on the comments on the Membership and Technical Governance
>     sections of the charter, and also discuss CLA/DCO if we have more
>     input/guidance on this from the LF.
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com
Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-30 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-30 16:01 O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-11-30 17:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-30 22:08   ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-12-01  9:20     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-01  9:40       ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-11-30 17:39 ` Michael Dolan
2016-11-30 20:55   ` Dave Neary [this message]
2016-12-01 17:40   ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-12-01 17:46     ` Ed Warnicke
2016-12-01 18:01     ` Michael Dolan
2016-12-01 18:41     ` Dave Neary
2016-12-01 18:50       ` Dave Neary
2016-12-01 19:09         ` Francois Ozog
2016-12-01 19:44           ` Michael Dolan
2016-12-01 20:20             ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-12-01 20:47               ` Wiles, Keith
2016-12-01 21:33           ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-12-02  9:00             ` Francois Ozog
2016-12-01 20:33       ` O'Driscoll, Tim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=583F3CA5.7060803@redhat.com \
    --to=dneary@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdolan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=moving@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK community structure changes

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving/0 moving/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 moving moving/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/moving \
		moving@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index moving

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.moving


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git