From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f170.google.com (mail-wj0-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D523F60E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:09:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ew7so88206115wjc.3 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 05:09:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SQq4Tk9/NEzpOKGXPJhvONLkHcj2cFqXxgCwfE1uYlg=; b=krWXjpfn2gRyxmQc3o0IbHGDBw874CS8wKjsN0xaufN+4fiF7oWB+hnD1CuZxT0PjB /mSgVB7kgSR5u4O2IQ0rgulsYUYZenZw2UUWIUmuLOchQhCSEZWA+ls4O5Vsccy/MpcY Stm23Zt/LbgyYilaClbzOPp5heh8MjmssMPKvCl0X3ZV6xdIfHEmv2oWyi3/90hAwE1s AyZ1YahDEz7XGXkV/HpTjjJkz5VbOjHmoZYUg1xL8aipfRKn+UeNqHbFZZwk8fCxlBhg jJGJ4XMakQK6x3TqXOCwHmkdYzglvXMH8Cfs7D3noAijVSeRhp+Asr/0lmHEY8UKPQdo 1w0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SQq4Tk9/NEzpOKGXPJhvONLkHcj2cFqXxgCwfE1uYlg=; b=fVUNpbHN0qnLTwjjJGfJnaP70xBTlhNy+fy98fcyyGZj2rvSqNiamaMUT36j9xaZCO k57OcL/o77aUpIQ/E4RdtfkXVDT7RmW5pnPXn0lIcBkJlsz8Byer33kLEQtoutFUdQ6L otrTWkduAQExIYPbqEDHo5HWamPR1gt1YnR3BHhKpKQmDzzpKpY84LAM/fl4qG8uBIxu +RIg0wcXm0jLZCIcuHGg3XqJJIy3rDvHVOc/835H4zmcNvYLIhvdEqLF6fFw5iHtoCmF F0Bu+ByoG6MCUVwZe4JKvfhCWt6Dt5axNBi6T+Zr2JLNxKcpJIuc+2FaWdMjrqtW796Q Zpzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKyHpOXiBwk8zbl2B4i+g/Wl2v0bdOg0ACx0aCN7/sGazRbIsipxTpIbAttmDnuMV/q X-Received: by 10.194.145.197 with SMTP id sw5mr5179000wjb.156.1484140163722; Wed, 11 Jan 2017 05:09:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.16.0.240] (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net. [82.239.227.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f126sm29542454wme.22.2017.01.11.05.09.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 05:09:22 -0800 (PST) To: Dave Neary , "O'Driscoll, Tim" , Kevin Traynor , "moving@dpdk.org" References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA72299670@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <316115b3-35ee-d99b-6965-21b2b088aa76@redhat.com> From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <5c225c4b-314a-e83e-cbb9-2f3df9c23f0e@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:09:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <316115b3-35ee-d99b-6965-21b2b088aa76@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Minutes from "Moving DPDK to Linux Foundation" call, December 20th X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:09:24 -0000 Le 11/01/2017 à 14:04, Dave Neary a écrit : > It seems that if the review of the technical governance is now complete, > and the DPDK developer community (and in particular the current > technical board) is OK with any changes proposed, the biggest remaining > item will be the budget proposal and setting of membership fees. Hi Dave, I agree that we are close, but there are still some few topics that were raised based on some reviews of the charter during the seasonal: - meetings of the Governing board should be opened, I heard from Mike that there are some issues because some people do not like 'open board'. Please, they need to be explained. - there will be a fee for the lab, it shall be the *same fee* for everyone so everyone share the same constraints and benefits for the same fee. I guess, they can be solved quickly. Best regards, Vincent