From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0533C5599 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:16:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id t79so131330904wmt.0 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:16:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=10ADM0us3Qgfdg6SbfKdtWcJNiND05q7Vpk+ldNBNcU=; b=0fDt+vosa2TR0uUaH9LmEBJdeHSmeDzsAoUKgfvHHS9VrqUSBQIabpIvSERCIuXGla sn2OtcCrnRtLyBLfQxjCgTCHibOHQBE2eFKhpFUiwSYwWb9V7RTPpdnVaer1quB1zstw 4AkpJuhTZSWOowBp54RaNNqsL92DLBaM+3zEA7g0My2UpZUxSwqRpVMh9F7NUdQ1PnKM ecFbq3L1WAtZI4zpA0uk7HRVv4mxiXuDfEE5do3keX4NFBxFEmRwEv+gCtJDvMvegqSa s1O4Outpj0AQohBiAP2KFyHUoF4MbbvFUN1ddHJuNo9Bi8Ue6AOS4fAPpTCS24UsXTDm ZB4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=10ADM0us3Qgfdg6SbfKdtWcJNiND05q7Vpk+ldNBNcU=; b=bGYgzZxVVZzvf+Rkft0JqCyG+cjtm+dPaKXjgVZXHrQQgFID3dWiSrSiRypOQn55fX sFoik9ar21C/zbXp5MBfHPc/HQar4NLa35w5Cgv1gynamsKbWQxKoyRTHCp9QMY7nj5Y CUruCuTJRYCKnTbsiACtzhJDZXIVkZJmxrTge7HetWBnK9v5kjt2UlOeidgqREaiWLzV RZ/dh0Iq7FvFeldxpj8IzFxnlaglF2YX9K1rjGpJ9Ps0fel2keL8YpQfuyGwv4tGtSMz QHO0qZGBD6hSq/jPLVF+070t0U113XMTBsDs2yXU6V4wV9K9aeCjRDUibOoOcFLdMlM+ k2vA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd1Jm1/QB33RES4yzgbGaFvzU9/48+bZPr1s9sTGTrFgivFH2wP8udEnV2kVdNA7Mmb X-Received: by 10.25.37.134 with SMTP id l128mr297521lfl.120.1479374190629; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:16:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.255.41.172] ([194.251.119.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m129sm536442lfe.6.2016.11.17.01.16.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:16:29 -0800 (PST) To: "moving@dpdk.org" References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA676143A8@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <582CBF39.5080508@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Neary , "O'Driscoll, Tim" From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <68b6a73c-2e4e-f247-9ec9-9c5a7ed12f28@6wind.com> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:16:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <582CBF39.5080508@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Board Names X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:16:31 -0000 Le 16/11/2016 à 21:19, Dave Neary a écrit : >> For the board itself, there are several options including: >> > 1.a Governing Board. This is frequently used in other LF projects. >> > 1.b Board of Directors. This is also frequently used in other LF projects. >> > 1.c DPDK Board. This is a bit more neutral and doesn't imply that the board governs the technical aspects of the project. >> > 1.d DPDK Marketing & CI Board. This is more specific, but is a bit misleading as the board only manages the budget for CI, not all aspects of CI. > I have a preference for "DPDK Governing Board" - but I agree that there > is a potential implication of control over the technical governance we > should avoid. > What's about "Administrative Board" in order to support the scope we are trying to set?