From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426B5FFA for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:27:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2016 01:27:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,504,1473145200"; d="scan'208";a="1069705313" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2016 01:27:21 -0800 Received: from irsmsx111.ger.corp.intel.com (10.108.20.4) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:27:10 +0000 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.91]) by irsmsx111.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.55]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:27:10 +0000 From: "Mcnamara, John" To: Jerin Jacob , "Richardson, Bruce" CC: Thomas Monjalon , "moving@dpdk.org" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model Thread-Index: AdI/l7PhpM0xx4kTSdma4UibzjQDRgAXueWAAAlbN4AACWV+AAAcmEyQ Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:27:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1660077.mdFWPiNUk9@xps13> <20161116151348.GA31872@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <20161116194251.GA7874@svelivela-lt.caveonetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <20161116194251.GA7874@svelivela-lt.caveonetworks.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiOGI1MmIzY2UtM2YyMy00ZDU5LTkwMTctZDRlYTgxYzdlMmM4IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Ik5sY1Arait1RFhPcllxKzFseVlTODV1MnZYSzVlcGNmSDJpM2NIRHBYVlU9In0= x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:27:23 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:43 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Mcnamara, John > ; moving@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh > ; yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com; De Lara Guarch, > Pablo > Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model >=20 > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:13:49PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:45:55AM +0000, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > ... > > > > Now, I believe multi-committer model is much more conducive to this > > way of working (though it does not strictly require multiple > committers). > > So long as one trusted committer (and all committers need to be > > trusted) is happy with a patchset it should go in - provided a > > reasonable review period has elapsed. There is too much waiting for > > everyone to agree right now. >=20 > The main question would be who will part of committers list? Hi, The initial list could be made up from someone from 6Wind, Intel and an ARM= based company. If it is felt that someone else could be added then that co= uld be proposed. The OvS community had reasonably good guidelines about adding/removing comm= itters. I'd suggest that we use something similar: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/committer-gran= t-revocation.rst >=20 > I believe the multi-committers model may not fix current consensus > slowness issue. Instead, if we are focusing on reducing the workload of > Thomas, then I think git pull request based scheme will reduce the > workload. So, something like a Gerrit model? John