From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0049.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.1.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788AC378E for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:45:42 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=oVeJYIXo6AkWHfDH7VLKCIKWV1+m5Re5JvmFIV/1HUo=; b=O6MY//s32tTX++52t9URbO9CeoGqJxOi1fVcUOId+wIfgngMPQvmEdoNmH4F8/Nea/TdawBcbrGag/KVmXfJ6ldWVsaCjOT/gXLBWbXbAzyAfwAvay5MkSzLf3ipz2HJZs20bp50gqLvg29BS0VwEEdg4wW56w/GrcR4XbW1oUQ= Received: from DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.164.38.147) by DB5PR04MB1608.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.164.38.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.721.10; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:39 +0000 Received: from DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.38.147]) by DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.38.147]) with mapi id 15.01.0734.007; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:39 +0000 From: Hemant Agrawal To: "Wiles, Keith" , Thomas Monjalon CC: "Mcnamara, John" , Jerin Jacob , "Richardson, Bruce" , "moving@dpdk.org" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model Thread-Index: AdI/l7PhpM0xx4kTSdma4UibzjQDRgAXueWAAAlbN4AACWV+AAAcmEyQAAkmzwAAAMOngAArALsQ Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20161116194251.GA7874@svelivela-lt.caveonetworks.com> <1916104.Dc8TqC8RB2@xps13> <591DFA12-C6F8-4384-B241-40C84A11C100@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <591DFA12-C6F8-4384-B241-40C84A11C100@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [192.88.169.1] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5PR04MB1608; 7:fXIHPtK7q7H3C82D/HiISf/Z2hRNMD5rI1JO/W+sMWzRswnc6Vgx1kBAfjJF7HKLmBozP/5oGq8h8ZyzaabWum5b6Vi4CHkv9A2L49wy0gWx98q0jyKbkkdRyt3OmDyLHjXEBQu39WVEg+D/qYW26ZIuXdj1e3fl+XQufTg6TlkbdXb8QyED82iwU0spopvUubDc4PIIijkcBZID721QYix4IFvC3D8YgFLIzuWBp1XSWEzXk2tN4/z3AEVOedda1cld+PMUMAFBtSp2wIoaBzMnlA2swBUVnBpgZM4yDieFo58l1bAexaGaWZmS9p3b/de6Gc1hgDi7VmhmkwlqvWj8jjFU4Mvm72M2UuWHNUc= x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cfb7ad94-228f-4b47-145c-08d40fa0096b x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:DB5PR04MB1608; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6045074)(6060326)(6040281)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6061324)(6041223)(6046074); SRVR:DB5PR04MB1608; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5PR04MB1608; x-forefront-prvs: 01304918F3 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(377454003)(189002)(377424004)(24454002)(199003)(102836003)(86362001)(6116002)(101416001)(4326007)(66066001)(9686002)(3846002)(76176999)(2906002)(54356999)(7846002)(50986999)(97736004)(7736002)(6506003)(4001150100001)(7696004)(93886004)(76576001)(189998001)(2950100002)(8676002)(5001770100001)(33656002)(5660300001)(3660700001)(77096005)(87936001)(2900100001)(105586002)(68736007)(3280700002)(74316002)(8936002)(81156014)(106356001)(81166006)(229853002)(92566002)(305945005)(122556002)(38730400001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5PR04MB1608; H:DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Nov 2016 10:45:39.0256 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR04MB1608 Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:42 -0000 > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 7:36 PM > > On Nov 17, 2016, at 7:43 AM, Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > > > 2016-11-17 09:27, Mcnamara, John: > >> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com] > >>> I believe the multi-committers model may not fix current consensus > >>> slowness issue. Instead, if we are focusing on reducing the workload > >>> of Thomas, then I think git pull request based scheme will reduce > >>> the workload. > >> > >> So, something like a Gerrit model? > > > > No, the mechanics of committing is not time consuming. >=20 > The time consuming part is the reviewing the patch and using Gerrit does > attempt to make sure the reviewers are emailed directly. This to me helps= to > require reviews as sometimes the huge email volume on the list is difficu= lt to see > patches someone needs to review. >=20 > I would much more prefer one email (from Gerrit) per patch set instead of= 10 or > 30 emails in some cases for a single email. Using gerrit also combines th= e patch > review comments, patchwork and email list into one tool plus it can kick = off the > build and checkpatch processes. >=20 > Having a Gerrit model is not a bad process model and allows for multiple > committers. I know it is a new tool and it is pretty simple to use. [Hemant] I also agree that Gerrit is much better from committer, reviewer a= nd submitter prospective.=20 Why are we having reservations in moving to Gerrit?=20 >=20 > > >=20 > Regards, > Keith