From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0046.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.1.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949215681 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:45:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nxp.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=uG6AI0/gv2Itfx/0RFmzJ/F/2tcvIx91RsSLVErPqUk=; b=qy/5z5CHkYQnTEHsVJcvxObTaOFKoPM1HzlRtmHiGJ2OpuoSWElY1w/yb9Bcb3imI9P9iEGwbJV9DxTuPYoL4fhT7+RaneAqJ/DM51opZyPlR8gzgKanyKUNef+U5KGDfhCLQqhDHUEC7ejqIiLC9tLTOP6U++iVsqP0NquxOOI= Received: from DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.164.38.147) by DB5PR04MB1607.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.164.38.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.721.10; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:40 +0000 Received: from DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.38.147]) by DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.164.38.147]) with mapi id 15.01.0734.007; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:40 +0000 From: Hemant Agrawal To: "Mcnamara, John" , Jerin Jacob , "Richardson, Bruce" CC: Thomas Monjalon , "moving@dpdk.org" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com" , "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model Thread-Index: AdI/l7PhpM0xx4kTSdma4UibzjQDRgAXueWAAAlbN4AACWV+AAAcmEyQADT+EGA= Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1660077.mdFWPiNUk9@xps13> <20161116151348.GA31872@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> <20161116194251.GA7874@svelivela-lt.caveonetworks.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [192.88.169.1] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5PR04MB1607; 7:oj7I8wfInRXJ+8j29fBPnw5JfTjmq0TmBTzOGz9IkPcvtMhK2vKxOs143fYWs1JS0nQmAy+LkgjLb+yZxW+z5UYjiJBTqjQPfVDsVQdRVDjsymDBogOrSXTK9qbTPYIeKHxHtT0pTAcU+EZQ6/IRRC0OAxXKOFEmN6jJ5nKa/l7COHDIfN+MEl6MQSu69vK181tZ4Rlrbe3+g/CR94vPPGjCB5CXcN0CFcvjKn5RppmZsBNkWhp+1Rjj84hQRSXg4EQNMfA1fJn/d6yoahF5xhFQncuCPs/CczMOApqKldWcPH9MbsZhRg28K5yckglYThTcF/aj443g67LEdhgFxJMRPeY14DF0rC7hYPPPHLo= x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: dd8213c4-ddc1-404d-c1e2-08d40fa00a12 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:DB5PR04MB1607; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820)(228905959029699); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6045074)(6060326)(6040281)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6061324)(6041223)(6046074); SRVR:DB5PR04MB1607; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5PR04MB1607; x-forefront-prvs: 01304918F3 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(24454002)(13464003)(189002)(377454003)(199003)(106356001)(229853002)(81156014)(68736007)(86362001)(6506003)(81166006)(9686002)(189998001)(561944003)(2900100001)(5660300001)(54356999)(7736002)(33656002)(76176999)(50986999)(87936001)(66066001)(105586002)(7846002)(2906002)(97736004)(122556002)(5001770100001)(305945005)(92566002)(93886004)(101416001)(74316002)(7696004)(4326007)(2950100002)(3660700001)(8676002)(77096005)(8936002)(6116002)(3280700002)(3846002)(102836003)(38730400001)(76576001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5PR04MB1607; H:DB5PR04MB1605.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nxp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Nov 2016 10:45:40.2136 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR04MB1607 Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:45:44 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: moving [mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Mcnamara, > John > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:57 PM > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:43 PM > > To: Richardson, Bruce > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; Mcnamara, John > > ; moving@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh > > ; yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com; De Lara Guarch, > > Pablo > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Proposal a Committer model > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:13:49PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:45:55AM +0000, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Now, I believe multi-committer model is much more conducive to this > > > way of working (though it does not strictly require multiple > > committers). > > > So long as one trusted committer (and all committers need to be > > > trusted) is happy with a patchset it should go in - provided a > > > reasonable review period has elapsed. There is too much waiting for > > > everyone to agree right now. > > > > The main question would be who will part of committers list? >=20 > Hi, >=20 > The initial list could be made up from someone from 6Wind, Intel and an A= RM > based company. If it is felt that someone else could be added then that c= ould be > proposed. >=20 > The OvS community had reasonably good guidelines about adding/removing > committers. I'd suggest that we use something similar: >=20 > https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/committer- > grant-revocation.rst >=20 >=20 [Hemant] The OVS guidelines are good one.=20 Again, there should be a cap on numbers of committers from a single organi= zation.=20