Cool, count me in if we have quorum. George From: Michael Dolan [mailto:mdolan@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:15 AM To: George Zhao Cc: Vincent JARDIN; O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh; Ed Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees I can explore finding a room if there will be enough people present. Who plans to be there? --- Mike Dolan VP of Strategic Programs The Linux Foundation Office: +1.330.460.3250 Cell: +1.440.552.5322 Skype: michaelkdolan mdolan@linuxfoundation.org --- On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, George Zhao > wrote: Question: Will there be a f2f discussion of this topic during Open source leadership summit by Linux foundation? Thanks, George -----Original Message----- From: moving [mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vincent JARDIN Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 3:46 PM To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh Cc: Michael Dolan; Ed Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees Le 17/01/2017 à 23:28, O'Driscoll, Tim a écrit : > "I said that Red Hat is happy with the technical operation of the > project, and we don't want to see the community disrupted with toolset > changes - and it's possible to work with projects like fd.io, OVS, and > OPNFV to do testing of DPDK. > > Representatives from Brocade, Cavium, and Linaro all voiced a preference > for a stand-alone lightweight project" +1 too DPDK is consumed by many projects and it was proven to be a successful model. By launching DPDK.org, 6WIND wanted to stimulate DPDK to be a reference for many consumers of IOs (FD.io, ovs-dpdk, moongen, ostinato, etc.) on any HW. Since day 1 of DPDK.org, DPDK allows to sustain any innovations because of a strong intent to be agnostic.