Cool,  count me in if we have quorum.

George

From: Michael Dolan [mailto:mdolan@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:15 AM
To: George Zhao
Cc: Vincent JARDIN; O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh; Ed Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees

I can explore finding a room if there will be enough people present. Who plans to be there?

---
Mike Dolan
VP of Strategic Programs
The Linux Foundation
Office: +1.330.460.3250   Cell: +1.440.552.5322  Skype: michaelkdolan
mdolan@linuxfoundation.org
---

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, George Zhao <George.Y.Zhao@huawei.com> wrote:

Question: Will there be a f2f discussion of this topic during Open source leadership summit by Linux foundation?

Thanks,
George

-----Original Message-----
From: moving [mailto:moving-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vincent JARDIN
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 3:46 PM
To: O'Driscoll, Tim; Ed Warnicke; Jaswinder Singh
Cc: Michael Dolan; Ed Warnicke (eaw); moving@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] DPDK + Linux Foundation - summary of fees

Le 17/01/2017 à 23:28, O'Driscoll, Tim a écrit :
> "I said that Red Hat is happy with the technical operation of the
> project, and we don't want to see the community disrupted with toolset
> changes - and it's possible to work with projects like fd.io, OVS, and
> OPNFV to do testing of DPDK.
>
> Representatives from Brocade, Cavium, and Linaro all voiced a preference
> for a stand-alone lightweight project"

+1 too

DPDK is consumed by many projects and it was proven to be a successful
model. By launching DPDK.org, 6WIND wanted to stimulate DPDK to be a
reference for many consumers of IOs (FD.io, ovs-dpdk, moongen, ostinato,
etc.) on any HW.

Since day 1 of DPDK.org, DPDK allows to sustain any innovations because
of a strong intent to be agnostic.