From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD81EFE5 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:36:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27CE63DD47 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-41-137.bos.redhat.com (ovpn-123-255.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.255] (may be forged)) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v1KGaiiK019619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:36:44 -0500 To: moving@dpdk.org References: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C05A9@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> From: Dave Neary Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:36:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26FA93C7ED1EAA44AB77D62FBE1D27BA722C05A9@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [dpdk-moving] Proposing to cancel tomorrow's "Moving DPDK to LF" call X-BeenThere: moving@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK community structure changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:36:45 -0000 Thanks Tim, I think the main blocking factor at this stage is a budget refresh that we can use as a basis for relative priorities for expenditure - which will feed into funding level discussions. Thanks, Dave. On 02/20/2017 09:26 AM, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > I propose that we cancel tomorrow's call on "Moving DPDK to the Linux Foundation". The main item we need to talk about is the status of the membership discussions, and whether it's realistic to be ready for a project launch to coincide with ONS at the start of April. However, due to the LF's open source leadership summit last week and a public holiday in the USA today (Presidents' Day), I don't think much will have changed since our last discussion on this. Postponing this for a week will allow more time for 1:1 discussions to happen so that we have a full picture. > > If anybody has any concerns, or other topics that they want to cover tomorrow, please comment. If there are no objections then we'll cancel tomorrow's meeting and discuss membership status next week instead. > > > Tim > -- Dave Neary - NFV/SDN Community Strategy Open Source and Standards, Red Hat - http://community.redhat.com Ph: +1-978-399-2182 / Cell: +1-978-799-3338