From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.147]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E191B19 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 03:09:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from vc1.ecl.ntt.co.jp (vc1.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.86.153]) by tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w0F29rja002200; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:09:53 +0900 Received: from vc1.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc1.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C365F680; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:09:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.87.134]) by vc1.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCF35F590; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:09:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (watercress.nslab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.13.73]) by jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8728D400B42; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:09:53 +0900 (JST) References: <201801100246.w0A2kio5005692@imss03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> <1b2fb573-783c-bda2-5e4f-e3f1a85cbce4@lab.ntt.co.jp> <7de5cc0e-2bb9-2e66-6c5c-2d690f15f2ab@intel.com> From: Yasufumi Ogawa Message-ID: <042a7784-c4e2-4657-7e40-663adede6322@lab.ntt.co.jp> Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:08:22 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7de5cc0e-2bb9-2e66-6c5c-2d690f15f2ab@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CC-Mail-RelayStamp: 1 To: Ferruh Yigit , x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp, spp@dpdk.org X-TM-AS-MML: disable Subject: Re: [spp] Patches for spp_vf on DPDK17.11 X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 02:09:55 -0000 Hi Ferruh, Sorry for ambiguously for my reply. I would like to merge both of series including later 4 patches. I will send acked-by for future patches. > And another question is current head in spp tested on v17.11? Is it safe to tag > it as v17.11? Thank you for your suggestion. I have tested with DPDK 17.11 and we should to do tagging. Considering that Hiroyuki is going to send another patches for documentation, I would like to send a patch for updating Makefile to tag 17.11 soon after him. Thanks, Yasufumi On 2018/01/13 22:38, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/10/2018 7:53 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: >> Hi Hiroyuki, Ferruh, >> >> Thanks Hiroyuki for considering to update. I tried to compile and run it >> without errors or warnings for DPDK 17.11. It seems to work fine. >> >> As Hiroyuki mentioned in previously, there are still remained warnings >> for coding style from checkpatch and we need to fix them as the next >> task. Thank you for your contributions! >> >> Ferruh, could you merge patches from Hiroyuki? > > Hiroyuki thanks for the patches, and Yasufumi thank you for the review and testing. > > Yasufumi, > > There are two patchsets, one is this one with 4 patches and other is with 57 > patches. And as far as I can this one depends the other one. > > Are you OK to getting both of the patchsets? > btw, I will add your ack explicitly to all. > > And another question is current head in spp tested on v17.11? Is it safe to tag > it as v17.11? > > Thanks, > ferruh > >> >> Thanks, >> Yasufumi >> >> On 2018/01/10 11:46, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Last year, we've sent some patches for spp_vf on DPDK17.08. >>> In addition to these patches, we are now ready to contribute >>> the patches for spp_vf on DPDK17.11. >>> >>> Code changes will be posted in the following emails. >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- Yasufumi Ogawa NTT Network Service Systems Labs