From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.147]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978094CBD for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:01:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.86.154]) by tama50.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w7RB1adE009222; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 20:01:36 +0900 Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1438C639288; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 20:01:36 +0900 (JST) Received: from jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.87.134]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093EC6391CD; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 20:01:36 +0900 (JST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (watercress.nslab.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.13.73]) by jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01CEB400921; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 20:01:36 +0900 (JST) From: Yasufumi Ogawa References: <692acfa8-7f87-6d08-61a5-baafea9d8d19@intel.com> <80bb0dbe-04f1-503d-95e2-5cc37033a524@intel.com> Message-ID: <737dddd6-fbc5-0bc8-11fb-97c4e30908e2@lab.ntt.co.jp> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:59:44 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <80bb0dbe-04f1-503d-95e2-5cc37033a524@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CC-Mail-RelayStamp: 1 To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: dpdk-spp X-TM-AS-MML: disable Subject: Re: [spp] DPDK v18.08 support X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:01:38 -0000 > On 8/23/2018 2:58 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: >>> Hi Yasufumi, >>> >>> I am sure you already aware but for the record for mail list, latest spp doesn't >>> compile with latest DPDK v18.08 release because of some deprecated fields and APIs. >>> >>> Do you guys already have a plan for the DPDK v18.08 support? >> Hi Ferruh, >> >> Yes. I should replace deprecated rte_eth_dev_attach/detach() with rte_eal_hotplug_add/remove(). I have learned how to use this >> new APIs and will send patches to make the changes. >> >> At first, I would like to add 'CFLAGS += -Wno-deprecated-declarations' option to avoid the problem similar to DPDK, then change >> to new APIs. > > That would work but I am not sure how good idea it is. > Deprecated deprecation is notify you to update your application, I think we > shouldn't suppress these warnings. OK. I would like to try to fix with new APIs. I already sent patches for the issue and I will send next patches as version 2. Thanks for your comment. Yasufumi > >> >> Thanks, >> Yasufumi >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> ferruh >>> >>