From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E048E44C3 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 14:38:54 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2018 05:38:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,353,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="19042020" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.22.189]) ([10.252.22.189]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2018 05:38:52 -0800 To: Yasufumi Ogawa , x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp, spp@dpdk.org References: <201801100246.w0A2kio5005692@imss03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> <1b2fb573-783c-bda2-5e4f-e3f1a85cbce4@lab.ntt.co.jp> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <7de5cc0e-2bb9-2e66-6c5c-2d690f15f2ab@intel.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:38:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1b2fb573-783c-bda2-5e4f-e3f1a85cbce4@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [spp] Patches for spp_vf on DPDK17.11 X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:38:55 -0000 On 1/10/2018 7:53 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: > Hi Hiroyuki, Ferruh, > > Thanks Hiroyuki for considering to update. I tried to compile and run it > without errors or warnings for DPDK 17.11. It seems to work fine. > > As Hiroyuki mentioned in previously, there are still remained warnings > for coding style from checkpatch and we need to fix them as the next > task. Thank you for your contributions! > > Ferruh, could you merge patches from Hiroyuki? Hiroyuki thanks for the patches, and Yasufumi thank you for the review and testing. Yasufumi, There are two patchsets, one is this one with 4 patches and other is with 57 patches. And as far as I can this one depends the other one. Are you OK to getting both of the patchsets? btw, I will add your ack explicitly to all. And another question is current head in spp tested on v17.11? Is it safe to tag it as v17.11? Thanks, ferruh > > Thanks, > Yasufumi > > On 2018/01/10 11:46, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> Last year, we've sent some patches for spp_vf on DPDK17.08. >> In addition to these patches, we are now ready to contribute >> the patches for spp_vf on DPDK17.11. >> >> Code changes will be posted in the following emails. >> >> > >