Soft Patch Panel
 help / color / Atom feed
* [spp] [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS
@ 2019-12-16  9:17 x-fn-spp
  2019-12-17  6:44 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: x-fn-spp @ 2019-12-16  9:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ferruh.yigit, yasufum.o; +Cc: spp

From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>

So far installation of SPP is done by making source code.
It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM.
This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP.
RST document is also updated to support this type of installation.

Hideyuki Yamashita (2):
  docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
  docs: introduce RPM package support

 docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec     | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec

-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [spp] [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS
  2019-12-16  9:17 [spp] [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS x-fn-spp
@ 2019-12-17  6:44 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  2019-12-18  2:00   ` [spp] [spp 04694] " Hideyuki Yamashita
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yasufumi Ogawa @ 2019-12-17  6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: x-fn-spp; +Cc: ferruh.yigit, spp

Hi Hideyuki,

I'm not sure the version of SPP because this update looks describing for 
v18.08.4 while the latest SPP is 19.08. Are you targeting not the master 
branch but v18.08.4 branch?

Yasufumi

On 2019/12/16 18:17, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote:
> From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
> 
> So far installation of SPP is done by making source code.
> It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM.
> This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP.
> RST document is also updated to support this type of installation.
> 
> Hideyuki Yamashita (2):
>    docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
>    docs: introduce RPM package support
> 
>   docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec     | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [spp] [spp 04694] Re: [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS
  2019-12-17  6:44 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
@ 2019-12-18  2:00   ` " Hideyuki Yamashita
  2019-12-18  8:12     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  2019-12-18  8:51     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hideyuki Yamashita @ 2019-12-18  2:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasufumi Ogawa; +Cc: x-fn-spp, ferruh.yigit, spp

Hi Yasufumi,

You are correct.
Patch set is intened to update v18.08.4 branch not master.
I appologize to confuse.

If I have to update patch set itself with reagrd to the targeting
version, please let me know.

Thanks in advance.

BR,
Hideyui Yamashita
NTT TechnoCross

> Hi Hideyuki,
> 
> I'm not sure the version of SPP because this update looks describing for v18.08.4 while the latest SPP is 19.08. Are you targeting not the master branch but v18.08.4 branch?
> 
> Yasufumi
> 
> On 2019/12/16 18:17, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote:
> > From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
> >
> > So far installation of SPP is done by making source code.
> > It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM.
> > This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP.
> > RST document is also updated to support this type of installation.
> >
> > Hideyuki Yamashita (2):
> >    docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
> >    docs: introduce RPM package support
> >
> >   docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec     | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec
> > 




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [spp] [spp 04694] Re: [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS
  2019-12-18  2:00   ` [spp] [spp 04694] " Hideyuki Yamashita
@ 2019-12-18  8:12     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  2019-12-18  8:51     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yasufumi Ogawa @ 2019-12-18  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hideyuki Yamashita; +Cc: x-fn-spp, ferruh.yigit, spp

On 2019/12/18 11:00, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote:
> Hi Yasufumi,
> 
> You are correct.
> Patch set is intened to update v18.08.4 branch not master.
OK, Thanks!

> I appologize to confuse.
> 
> If I have to update patch set itself with reagrd to the targeting
> version, please let me know.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> BR,
> Hideyui Yamashita
> NTT TechnoCross
> 
>> Hi Hideyuki,
>>
>> I'm not sure the version of SPP because this update looks describing for v18.08.4 while the latest SPP is 19.08. Are you targeting not the master branch but v18.08.4 branch?
>>
>> Yasufumi
>>
>> On 2019/12/16 18:17, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote:
>>> From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
>>>
>>> So far installation of SPP is done by making source code.
>>> It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM.
>>> This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP.
>>> RST document is also updated to support this type of installation.
>>>
>>> Hideyuki Yamashita (2):
>>>     docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
>>>     docs: introduce RPM package support
>>>
>>>    docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>    rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec     | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec
>>>
> 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [spp] [spp 04694] Re: [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS
  2019-12-18  2:00   ` [spp] [spp 04694] " Hideyuki Yamashita
  2019-12-18  8:12     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
@ 2019-12-18  8:51     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  2019-12-19  2:38       ` [spp] [spp 04700] " Hideyuki Yamashita
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yasufumi Ogawa @ 2019-12-18  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hideyuki Yamashita; +Cc: x-fn-spp, ferruh.yigit, spp

On 2019/12/18 11:00, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote:
> Hi Yasufumi,
> 
> You are correct.
> Patch set is intened to update v18.08.4 branch not master.
> I appologize to confuse.
> 
> If I have to update patch set itself with reagrd to the targeting
> version, please let me know.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
LGTM, but I have a question and a comment.

What do you think to provide rpm for the latest SPP?

 > docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
It is more appropriate to use another label instead of 'docs' because 
your spec file is not included in docs. I'd like to suggest you to use 
the name of directory 'rpmbuild' simply. If you agree, I'd change the 
label while applying the change.

Thanks,
Yasufumi
> 
> BR,
> Hideyui Yamashita
> NTT TechnoCross
> 
>> Hi Hideyuki,
>>
>> I'm not sure the version of SPP because this update looks describing for v18.08.4 while the latest SPP is 19.08. Are you targeting not the master branch but v18.08.4 branch?
>>
>> Yasufumi
>>
>> On 2019/12/16 18:17, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote:
>>> From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
>>>
>>> So far installation of SPP is done by making source code.
>>> It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM.
>>> This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP.
>>> RST document is also updated to support this type of installation.
>>>
>>> Hideyuki Yamashita (2):
>>>     docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
>>>     docs: introduce RPM package support
>>>
>>>    docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>    rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec     | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec
>>>
> 
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [spp] [spp 04700] Re: [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS
  2019-12-18  8:51     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
@ 2019-12-19  2:38       ` " Hideyuki Yamashita
  2019-12-19  5:57         ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Hideyuki Yamashita @ 2019-12-19  2:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yasufumi Ogawa; +Cc: x-fn-spp, ferruh.yigit, spp

Hi Yasufumi,

Please see inline.

> On 2019/12/18 11:00, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote:
> > Hi Yasufumi,
> >
> > You are correct.
> > Patch set is intened to update v18.08.4 branch not master.
> > I appologize to confuse.
> >
> > If I have to update patch set itself with reagrd to the targeting
> > version, please let me know.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> LGTM, but I have a question and a comment.
> 
> What do you think to provide rpm for the latest SPP?
If I have a chance to test SPP on latest DPDK and if some updates needed
then I will request changes on master.

>  > docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
> It is more appropriate to use another label instead of 'docs' because your spec file is not included in docs. I'd like to suggest you to use the name of directory 'rpmbuild' simply. If you agree, I'd change the label while applying the change.
No problem about your changing label on patchset (spec file).

Thanks!
BR,
HIdeyuki Yamashita
NTT TechnoCross


> Thanks,
> Yasufumi
> >
> > BR,
> > Hideyui Yamashita
> > NTT TechnoCross
> >
> >> Hi Hideyuki,
> >>
> >> I'm not sure the version of SPP because this update looks describing for v18.08.4 while the latest SPP is 19.08. Are you targeting not the master branch but v18.08.4 branch?
> >>
> >> Yasufumi
> >>
> >> On 2019/12/16 18:17, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote:
> >>> From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
> >>>
> >>> So far installation of SPP is done by making source code.
> >>> It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM.
> >>> This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP.
> >>> RST document is also updated to support this type of installation.
> >>>
> >>> Hideyuki Yamashita (2):
> >>>     docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
> >>>     docs: introduce RPM package support
> >>>
> >>>    docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>    rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec     | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>    2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>    create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec
> >>>
> >
> >
> > 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [spp] [spp 04700] Re: [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS
  2019-12-19  2:38       ` [spp] [spp 04700] " Hideyuki Yamashita
@ 2019-12-19  5:57         ` Yasufumi Ogawa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Yasufumi Ogawa @ 2019-12-19  5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hideyuki Yamashita; +Cc: x-fn-spp, ferruh.yigit, spp

On 2019/12/19 11:38, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote:
> Hi Yasufumi,
> 
> Please see inline.
> 
>> On 2019/12/18 11:00, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote:
>>> Hi Yasufumi,
>>>
>>> You are correct.
>>> Patch set is intened to update v18.08.4 branch not master.
>>> I appologize to confuse.
>>>
>>> If I have to update patch set itself with reagrd to the targeting
>>> version, please let me know.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>> LGTM, but I have a question and a comment.
>>
>> What do you think to provide rpm for the latest SPP?
> If I have a chance to test SPP on latest DPDK and if some updates needed
> then I will request changes on master.
> 
>>   > docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
>> It is more appropriate to use another label instead of 'docs' because your spec file is not included in docs. I'd like to suggest you to use the name of directory 'rpmbuild' simply. If you agree, I'd change the label while applying the change.
> No problem about your changing label on patchset (spec file).
> 
> Thanks!
> BR,
> HIdeyuki Yamashita
> NTT TechnoCross
Applied, thank.

Acked-by: Yasufumi Ogawa <yasufum.o@gmail.com>
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Yasufumi
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Hideyui Yamashita
>>> NTT TechnoCross
>>>
>>>> Hi Hideyuki,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure the version of SPP because this update looks describing for v18.08.4 while the latest SPP is 19.08. Are you targeting not the master branch but v18.08.4 branch?
>>>>
>>>> Yasufumi
>>>>
>>>> On 2019/12/16 18:17, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote:
>>>>> From: Hideyuki Yamashita <yamashita.hideyuki@po.ntt-tx.co.jp>
>>>>>
>>>>> So far installation of SPP is done by making source code.
>>>>> It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM.
>>>>> This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP.
>>>>> RST document is also updated to support this type of installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hideyuki Yamashita (2):
>>>>>      docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP
>>>>>      docs: introduce RPM package support
>>>>>
>>>>>     docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>     rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec     | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>     2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>>>     create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-16  9:17 [spp] [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS x-fn-spp
2019-12-17  6:44 ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-12-18  2:00   ` [spp] [spp 04694] " Hideyuki Yamashita
2019-12-18  8:12     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-12-18  8:51     ` Yasufumi Ogawa
2019-12-19  2:38       ` [spp] [spp 04700] " Hideyuki Yamashita
2019-12-19  5:57         ` Yasufumi Ogawa

Soft Patch Panel

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/spp/0 spp/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 spp spp/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/spp \
		spp@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index spp


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.spp


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox