From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90F8A04F0 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 06:58:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2291BE8A; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 06:58:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com (mail-pg1-f196.google.com [209.85.215.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983E91BE8A for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 06:58:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id k3so2538588pgc.3 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:58:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJ7YJQ6G3N4KCeoiUGWg8UpbZ/pHFfY916aWXZ1wHxI=; b=rOu+qmpIPASnSmJL4Q1j/Yuo8e3cwHNyyB5t+Py2LOFgxmG+CjN1i6XWGRXbvMfGk9 WTn8GyzAfwE5/tc1IuTJLxAJUTgqSYFsHfgUS9L0e1mAMwErci6Cp4KW/P7Xl6wDIhcQ AJ8rauUqQcC8P0opPpua1ABsEV3AYeaBRhyJwZSE5xF486YyjiGuUbr8fQ0WWkNpND3Y ZpKw0RcNAte6fMrxTYwMXP+xrQR6XWfF/VQsj+CUYIPfiszMnBN6FGzw1tSfVGZkrWxj LQ0dk8L8sLb3fH4FrWaQBRLon0gTInKUYdUWzYbmON8MLLx6TjhVvdjYm8/Nwg4bapoV wxoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJ7YJQ6G3N4KCeoiUGWg8UpbZ/pHFfY916aWXZ1wHxI=; b=oyHva89NAuCCqH3DVL6IW3O/DR7GboSj/1Vb4NBBtmuBK+obj0RQqEuSYVovfkv9Bs WvzK+a2JiCoAekMo+WgtuoACj79V2ejeyUrCYuZb9v0bsGwNld4UfalIBP9tdI0zzBMS upAaNr58Q83qSdEPWVsuFuAb/ue7o3Kvb77MFppXzKXj0bXCTlJeloHco43WeF2GOfpq JsZEy6+OTSf7PP3ewaMqL9EuI8OlC57SSqTja3hackkQFEIBDwj5bPjyZ35VEc76SCFm 2XdcY5MA5Sr2ositRbZV9yBcQe/qD7r0mzPuQmbfecby03cdEfnbaZRsHvGmSror1Jj7 FyGw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXhkBudl6azq3ANzf+7TSXe4b9DXJBiDpZeasLSCJtK3iHjGcSU 766MVhLzxPXVI1Ic6jGRaMjF4AN1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwD44U4Z6gFnndOM9KE05MaCxHLgSVhKu2Vj5Q15T0XZ2AyJXTOmpMsJOe4BgvRxgIk/VRGfg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:5547:: with SMTP id j68mr7946507pfb.6.1576735082697; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:58:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mugwort.local ([192.47.164.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l21sm4949576pjq.23.2019.12.18.21.58.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:58:02 -0800 (PST) To: Hideyuki Yamashita Cc: x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, spp@dpdk.org References: <20191218110021.303B.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> <040f1b8c-b143-9de2-ce04-c4886ac4fb1e@gmail.com> <20191219113829.ACA2.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> From: Yasufumi Ogawa Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 14:57:59 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191219113829.ACA2.17218CA3@ntt-tx.co.jp_1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [spp] [spp 04700] Re: [PATCH 0/2] support of RPM install on CentOS X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: spp-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "spp" On 2019/12/19 11:38, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote: > Hi Yasufumi, > > Please see inline. > >> On 2019/12/18 11:00, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote: >>> Hi Yasufumi, >>> >>> You are correct. >>> Patch set is intened to update v18.08.4 branch not master. >>> I appologize to confuse. >>> >>> If I have to update patch set itself with reagrd to the targeting >>> version, please let me know. >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >> LGTM, but I have a question and a comment. >> >> What do you think to provide rpm for the latest SPP? > If I have a chance to test SPP on latest DPDK and if some updates needed > then I will request changes on master. > >> > docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP >> It is more appropriate to use another label instead of 'docs' because your spec file is not included in docs. I'd like to suggest you to use the name of directory 'rpmbuild' simply. If you agree, I'd change the label while applying the change. > No problem about your changing label on patchset (spec file). > > Thanks! > BR, > HIdeyuki Yamashita > NTT TechnoCross Applied, thank. Acked-by: Yasufumi Ogawa > > >> Thanks, >> Yasufumi >>> >>> BR, >>> Hideyui Yamashita >>> NTT TechnoCross >>> >>>> Hi Hideyuki, >>>> >>>> I'm not sure the version of SPP because this update looks describing for v18.08.4 while the latest SPP is 19.08. Are you targeting not the master branch but v18.08.4 branch? >>>> >>>> Yasufumi >>>> >>>> On 2019/12/16 18:17, x-fn-spp@sl.ntt-tx.co.jp wrote: >>>>> From: Hideyuki Yamashita >>>>> >>>>> So far installation of SPP is done by making source code. >>>>> It is convenient for some users to install SPP using RPM. >>>>> This patch set provides spec file of SPP to generate RPM of SPP. >>>>> RST document is also updated to support this type of installation. >>>>> >>>>> Hideyuki Yamashita (2): >>>>> docs: add RPM installation for DPDK and SPP >>>>> docs: introduce RPM package support >>>>> >>>>> docs/guides/gsg/install.rst | 307 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>>>> rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 rpmbuild/SPECS/spp.spec >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > >