From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCCBA493 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 11:22:23 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2018 02:22:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,516,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="201315411" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.35]) ([10.237.220.35]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2018 02:22:20 -0800 To: Yasufumi Ogawa , Nakamura Hioryuki Cc: spp@dpdk.org, Hemant Agrawal References: <201802080556.w185uBLt011286@imss03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> <62f1b786-d541-bd82-4618-4e192f088ddc@intel.com> <201802090303.w1933nd3014061@ccmail03.silk.ntt-tx.co.jp> <559c62e1-425f-8a9d-5395-c067ef0453e3@lab.ntt.co.jp> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:22:20 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <559c62e1-425f-8a9d-5395-c067ef0453e3@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [spp] [spp 02181] Re: [PATCH 4/9] spp_vf: add BSD license X-BeenThere: spp@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Soft Patch Panel List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:22:24 -0000 On 2/9/2018 7:16 AM, Yasufumi Ogawa wrote: > On 2018/02/09 12:03, Nakamura Hioryuki wrote: >> Thank you for reviewing and pointing out. >> >> Revised patches are posted in the following emails. >> >>> Also DPDK is switching to SPDX tags, that makes license headers easy, we can >>> think about same thing for spp. Not for this patchset, but for future. >> >> Ok, Thank you for information. >> "spp_vf: add BSD license" is deleted from revised patchset, we will make >> change license header for future. >> >> Also, "[PATCH 8/9] spp_vf: refactor to comply with coding style" is >> deleted, because this will conflict with Yasufumi’s patch >> "[PATCH 2/2] spp_vf: update to improve usability" >> > > Hi Hiroyuki, Ferruh > > Thank you for comments for licensing. I did not be aware switching SPDX. > I think we should add this topic in next TODOs. > > Hiroyuki, thanks for contribution. However, I think it is not needed to > revise license only for spp_vf at this time. We should revise all of spp. > > Ferruh, If you find Hiroyuki's reply after merged previous patches, > could you do not re-merge revised patches to avoid to waste your time? I > would like to update all of files and send another patches later. Hi Yasufumi, Sure, I will wait for your patchset. btw, DPDK v18.02 is out now and available for testing with spp. Thanks, ferruh > > Thanks, > Yasufumi >